JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE经济文献杂志

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE(英文缩写 J ECON LIT),ISSN 0022-0515,eISSN 2328-8175,中文译名:经济文献杂志 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。

2026 年数据 · 影响因子
12.800
JCR 分区
Q1
CAS 分区
B1
近一年发文量
0
本站 PubMed 收录统计

发文量统计区间:2025-11-01 至 2026-10-31,按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。

ISSN: 0022-0515 · eISSN: 2328-8175 · 缩写: J ECON LIT ·中文: 经济文献杂志

期刊介绍

选择期刊介绍栏目

期刊简介

《经济文献杂志》(Journal of Economic Literature)是经济学领域极具影响力的综述与评论型期刊,由美国经济学会出版。它不发表常规原创研究论文,而是约请权威学者撰写对特定研究领域或重要著作的系统性文献评述,并设有书评、分类索引和经济学研究趋势分析等栏目。读者群主要为经济学研究者、教师、研究生以及需要快速把握学科前沿与文献脉络的政策分析人员。

研究方向

主要方向涵盖经济学的各个分支,包括微观经济学、宏观经济学、计量经济学、劳动、产业组织、国际贸易、发展经济学和经济思想史等。论文类型以受邀的综合性文献综述、方法论评论、重要著作深度书评以及学科年度进展梳理为主,也刊载对经济学研究工具和数据库的评介。

期刊特色

研究取向强调批判性整合而非报告单一实证结果,文章通常篇幅较长、引用广博,注重梳理概念演进、争议焦点与未来方向。写作门槛高,多为领域内资深学者执笔。适合希望系统了解某一经济学领域全貌、寻找研究缺口或用于研究生专题教学的读者。

投稿难度

投稿难度很高,但难度主要源于其约稿制和对学术权威性的要求,而非单纯的分区或指标。普通原创论文基本不被接受,建议先以读者身份熟悉其综述体例,若确有系统评述某一领域的积累,可主动与主编沟通选题可行性,并注重文献覆盖的全面性与批判深度。

历年影响因子趋势

JCR 数据年份影响因子JCR 分区
202112.905Q1
202212.600Q1
202311.500Q1
202410.600Q1
202512.800Q1

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE 最新收录文献

  1. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 12.8

    1. New Advances on an Old Question: Does Money Matter for Children's Outcomes?

    1. 旧问题的新进展:金钱对儿童发展结果是否重要?
    作者:
    Marianne E Page
    日期:
    2024-09

    Family income is a positive predictor of children's health, human capital, and later-life earnings, but determining the extent to which these associations reflect causal effects is challenging. A recent wave of natural and randomized experiments, together with increased accessibility of large-scale administrative data, are allowing us to gain new perspectives about the importance of families' monetary resources in the U.S. and other high-income countries. This review pulls the emerging literature together to provide deeper insights into what we know, and what we don't know, about the extent to which policies that provide more generous income transfers could make a difference to children's life chances. My reading of the evidence suggests that policies providing financial resources to economically vulnerable families have the potential to improve children's outcomes. The magnitude of predicted impacts varies considerably across studies, however, and may be related to specific features of the income-generating event that researchers' leverage.

  2. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 12.8

    2. What Can Economics Say about Alzheimer's Disease?

    作者:
    Amitabh Chandra, Courtney Coile, Corina Mommaerts
    日期:
    2023-06

    Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects one in ten people aged 65 or older and is the most expensive disease in the United States. We describe the central economic questions raised by AD. Although there is overlap with the economics of aging and health, the defining feature of the "economics of Alzheimer's disease" is an emphasis on choice by cognitively impaired patients that affects health and financial well-being, and situations in which dynamic contracts between patients and caregivers are useful but difficult to enforce. A focus on innovation in AD prevention, treatment, and care is also critical given the enormous social cost of AD and present lack of understanding of its causes, which raises questions of optimal resource allocation and alignment of private and social incentives. The enormous scope for economists to contribute to our understanding of AD-related issues including drug development, efficient care delivery, dynamic contracting, long-term care risk, financial decision-making, and the design of public programs for AD suggests a rich research program for many areas of economics.

  3. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 12.8

    3. The Economics of Tobacco Regulation: A Comprehensive Review.

    3. 烟草监管经济学:综合评述
    作者:
    Philip DeCicca, Donald Kenkel, Michael F Lovenheim
    日期:
    2022-09

    Tobacco regulation has been a major component of health policy in the developed world since the UK Royal College of Physicians' and the US Surgeon General's reports in the 1960s. Such regulation, which has intensified in the past two decades, includes cigarette taxation, place-based smoking bans in areas ranging from bars and restaurants to workplaces, and regulations designed to make tobacco products less desirable. More recently, the availability of alternative products, most notably e-cigarettes, has increased dramatically, and these products are just starting to be regulated. Despite an extensive body of research on tobacco regulations, there remains substantial debate regarding their effectiveness, and ultimately, their impact on economic welfare. We provide the first comprehensive review of the state of research in the economics of tobacco regulation in two decades.

  4. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 12.8

    4. How Well Do Automated Linking Methods Perform? Lessons from U.S. Historical Data.

    4. 自动化链接方法的性能如何?来自美国历史数据的启示
    作者:
    Martha Bailey, Connor Cole, Morgan Henderson, Catherine Massey
    日期:
    2020-12

    This paper reviews the literature in historical record linkage in the U.S. and examines the performance of widely-used record linking algorithms and common variations in their assumptions. We use two high-quality, hand-linked datasets and one synthetic ground truth to examine the direct effects of linking algorithms on data quality. We find that (1) no algorithm (including hand-linking) consistently produces representative samples; (2) 15 to 37 percent of links chosen by widely-used algorithms are classified as errors by trained human reviewers; and (3) false links are systematically related to baseline sample characteristics, showing that some algorithms may induce systematic measurement error into analyses. A case study shows that the combined effects of (1)-(3) attenuate estimates of the intergenerational income elasticity by up to 20 percent, and common variations in algorithm assumptions result in greater attenuation. As current practice moves to automate linking and increase link rates, these results highlight the important potential consequences of linking errors on inferences with linked data. We conclude with constructive suggestions for reducing linking errors and directions for future research.

  5. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 12.8

    5. Measuring Time Preferences.

    5. 测量时间偏好
    作者:
    Jonathan Cohen, Keith Marzilli Ericson, David Laibson, John Myles White
    日期:
    2020-06

    We review research that measures time preferences-i.e., preferences over intertemporal tradeoffs. We distinguish between studies using financial flows, which we call "money earlier or later" (MEL) decisions and studies that use time-dated consumption/effort. Under different structural models, we show how to translate what MEL experiments directly measure (required rates of return for financial flows) into a discount function over utils. We summarize empirical regularities found in MEL studies and the predictive power of those studies. We explain why MEL choices are driven in part by some factors that are distinct from underlying time preferences.

  6. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 12.8

    6. Immigration in American Economic History.

    6. 美国经济史中的移民
    作者:
    Ran Abramitzky, Leah Boustan
    日期:
    2017-12

    The United States has long been perceived as a land of opportunity for immigrants. Yet, both in the past and today, US natives have expressed concern that immigrants fail to integrate into US society and lower wages for existing workers. This paper reviews the literatures on historical and contemporary migrant flows, yielding new insights on migrant selection, assimilation of immigrants into US economy and society, and the effect of immigration on the labor market.

  7. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 12.8

    7. Static and Intertemporal Household Decisions.

    7. 静态和跨期家庭决策
    作者:
    Pierre-Andre Chiappori, Maurizio Mazzocco
    日期:
    2017-09

    We discuss the most popular static and dynamic models of household behavior. Our main objective is to explain which aspects of household decisions different models can account for. Using this insight, we describe testable implications, identification results, and estimation findings obtained in the literature. Particular attention is given to the ability of different models to answer various types of policy questions.

  8. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 12.8

    8. Health and the Economy in the United States, from 1750 to the Present.

    8. 1750年至今美国的健康与经济
    作者:
    Dora Costa
    日期:
    2015-09

    I discuss the health transition in the United States, bringing new data to bear on health indicators, and investigating the changing relationship between health, income, and the environment. I argue that scientific advances played an outsize role and that health improvements were largest among the poor. Health improvements were not a precondition for modern economic growth. The gains to health are largest when the economy has moved from "brawn" to "brains" because this is when the wage returns to education are high, leading the healthy to obtain more education. More education may improve use of health knowledge, producing a virtuous cycle.

  9. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 12.8

    9. The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence.

    9. 金融素养的经济重要性:理论与证据
    作者:
    Annamaria Lusardi, Olivia S Mitchell
    日期:
    2014-03

    This paper undertakes an assessment of a rapidly growing body of economic research on financial literacy. We start with an overview of theoretical research which casts financial knowledge as a form of investment in human capital. Endogenizing financial knowledge has important implications for welfare as well as policies intended to enhance levels of financial knowledge in the larger population. Next, we draw on recent surveys to establish how much (or how little) people know and identify the least financially savvy population subgroups. This is followed by an examination of the impact of financial literacy on economic decision-making in the United States and elsewhere. While the literature is still young, conclusions may be drawn about the effects and consequences of financial illiteracy and what works to remedy these gaps. A final section offers thoughts on what remains to be learned if researchers are to better inform theoretical and empirical models as well as public policy.

  10. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 12.8

    10. Building Bridges Between Structural and Program Evaluation Approaches to Evaluating Policy.

    10. 在结构性与项目评估方法之间搭建评估政策的桥梁
    作者:
    James J Heckman
    日期:
    2010-06-01

    This paper compares the structural approach to economic policy analysis with the program evaluation approach. It offers a third way to do policy analysis that combines the best features of both approaches. We illustrate the value of this alternative approach by making the implicit economics of LATE explicit, thereby extending the interpretability and range of policy questions that LATE can answer.

在 JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE 中搜索更多文献

支持中英文检索 · 智能翻译 · 影响因子 · PDF 下载 · AI 文献阅读

指标接近的期刊