REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES金融研究评论

REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES(英文缩写 REV FINANC STUD),ISSN 0893-9454,eISSN 1465-7368,中文译名:金融研究评论 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。

2026 年数据 · 影响因子
7.600
JCR 分区
Q1
CAS 分区
B1
近一年发文量
0
本站 PubMed 收录统计

发文量统计区间:2025-10-01 至 2026-09-30,按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。

ISSN: 0893-9454 · eISSN: 1465-7368 · 缩写: REV FINANC STUD ·中文: 金融研究评论

期刊介绍

选择期刊介绍栏目

期刊简介

《Review of Financial Studies》是金融学领域的国际顶级期刊之一,聚焦资产定价、公司金融、金融市场微观结构、行为金融与金融计量等方向。其读者群主要为高校金融学者、经济研究人员、博士研究生以及金融机构与监管部门的专业分析人员。该刊强调理论贡献与实证严谨性的结合,所刊论文常成为后续研究的重要参考,在学术界和政策讨论中具有广泛影响力。

研究方向

主要发表金融经济学各分支的研究论文,涵盖资产定价与投资组合、公司财务与治理、银行与金融中介、市场微观结构与交易、行为金融、金融计量方法及风险管理等主题。论文类型以原创性实证研究、理论模型和兼具两者特征的综合性研究为主,也偶见对重要领域进行批判性梳理的综述性文章。

期刊特色

研究取向强调问题的重要性、识别的可信度与结论的稳健性,偏好能够推动金融学理论或方法边界的工作。论文通常篇幅较长、论证细致,对数据质量、计量策略和经济机制阐释要求较高。适合已有扎实金融学训练、希望在国际学术平台展示成果的研究者,也适合关注前沿金融研究的政策与业界读者。

投稿难度

投稿难度整体较高,竞争激烈,对理论创新、实证识别和写作质量均有严格要求。准备时应明确核心贡献与文献定位,完善稳健性检验与机制分析,并重视审稿人可能提出的替代解释。选题宜兼具学术重要性与现实相关性,语言表达需清晰准确。不能仅凭分区或指标判断录用难易,建议预留充分修改时间并认真回应评审意见。

历年影响因子趋势

JCR 数据年份影响因子JCR 分区
20218.414Q1
20228.200Q1
20236.800Q1
20245.400Q1
20257.600Q1

REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES 最新收录文献

  1. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 7.6

    1. Destructive Creation at Work: How Financial Distress Spurs Entrepreneurship.

    1. 工作中的破坏性创造:财务困境如何激发创业精神
    作者:
    Tania Babina
    日期:
    2019-11-01

    Using U.S. Census firm-worker data, I document that firms' financial distress has an economically important effect on employee departures to entrepreneurship. The impact is amplified in the high-tech and service sectors, where employees are key assets. In states with enforceable noncompete contracts, the effect is mitigated. Compared to typical entrepreneurs, distress-driven entrepreneurs are high-wage workers who found better firms, as measured by jobs, pay, and survival. Startup jobs compensate for 33% of job losses at the constrained incumbents. Overall, the financial inability of incumbent firms to pursue productive opportunities increases the reallocation of economic activity into new firms. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

  2. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 7.6

    2. Does Aggregated Returns Disclosure Increase Portfolio Risk Taking?

    作者:
    John Beshears, James J Choi, David Laibson, Brigitte C Madrian
    日期:
    2016-10-19

    Many experiments have found that participants take more investment risk if they see returns less frequently, see portfolio-level returns (rather than each individual asset's returns), or see long-horizon (rather than one-year) historical return distributions. In contrast, we find that such information aggregation treatments do not affect total equity investment when we make the investment environment more realistic than in prior experiments. Previously documented aggregation effects are not robust to changes in the risky asset's return distribution or the introduction of a multi-day delay between portfolio choice and return realizations.

  3. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 7.6

    3. How Family Status and Social Security Claiming Options Shape Optimal Life Cycle Portfolios.

    作者:
    Andreas Hubener, Raimond Maurer, Olivia S Mitchell
    日期:
    2015-11-19

    We show how optimal household decisions regarding work, retirement, saving, portfolio allocations, and life insurance are shaped by the complex financial options embedded in U.S. Social Security rules and uncertain family transitions. Our life cycle model predicts sharp consumption drops on retirement, an age-62 peak in claiming rates, and earlier claiming by wives versus husbands and single women. Moreover, life insurance is mainly purchased on men's lives. Our model, which takes Social Security rules seriously, generates wealth and retirement outcomes that are more consistent with the data, in contrast to earlier and less realistic models.

  4. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 7.6

    4. The Bright Side of Corporate Diversification: Evidence from Internal Labor Markets.

    4. 企业多元化的光明面:来自内部劳动力市场的证据
    作者:
    Geoffrey Tate, Liu Yang
    日期:
    2015-02-11

    We document differences in human-capital deployment between diversified and focused firms. We find that diversified firms have higher labor productivity and that they redeploy labor to industries with better prospects in response to changing opportunities. The opportunities and incentives provided in internal labor markets in turn affect the development of workers' human capital. We find that workers more frequently transition to other industries in which their diversified firms operate and with smaller wage losses compared with workers in the open market, even when they leave their original firms. Overall, internal labor markets provide a bright side to corporate diversification.

  5. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 7.6

    5. Why Does the Law of One Price Fail? An Experiment on Index Mutual Funds.

    作者:
    James J Choi, David Laibson, Brigitte C Madrian
    日期:
    2010-04-01

    We conduct an experiment to evaluate why individuals invest in high-fee index funds. In our experiments, subjects allocate $10,000 across four S&P 500 index funds and are rewarded for their portfolio's subsequent return. Subjects overwhelmingly fail to minimize fees. We can reject the hypothesis that subjects buy high-fee index funds because of bundled non-portfolio services. Search costs for fees matter, but even when we eliminate these costs, fees are not minimized. Instead, subjects place high weight on annualized returns since inception. Fees paid decrease with financial literacy. Interestingly, subjects who choose high-fee funds sense they are making a mistake.

在 REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES 中搜索更多文献

支持中英文检索 · 智能翻译 · 影响因子 · PDF 下载 · AI 文献阅读

指标接近的期刊