Annual Review of Psychology心理学年鉴
Annual Review of Psychology(英文缩写 ANNU REV PSYCHOL),ISSN 0066-4308,eISSN 1545-2085,中文译名:心理学年鉴 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。
发文量统计区间：2025-11-01 至 2026-10-31，按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。
期刊介绍
历年影响因子趋势
| JCR 数据年份 | 影响因子 | JCR 分区 |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 27.782 | Q1 |
| 2022 | 24.800 | Q1 |
| 2023 | 23.600 | Q1 |
| 2024 | 29.400 | Q1 |
| 2025 | 41.800 | Q1 |
Annual Review of Psychology 最新收录文献
-
1. From Early Adversity to Lifespan Mental Health: The Interplay of Metabolism, Genetics, and Brain Plasticity.
1. 从早期逆境到终身心理健康：代谢、遗传与大脑可塑性的相互作用PMID:日期:2026-09-29Early life adverse experience, whether prenatal or postnatal, is a prevalent risk factor for altered trajectories of biological development, often culminating in comorbid metabolic and psychiatric disorders in adulthood, which represent a substantial public health burden. In this article, we review evidence that adversity-induced metabolic reconfiguration, specifically involving insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis, disrupts developmental processes in neural circuits governing stress regulation, reward learning, and executive control. We discuss how this "metabolic embedding" contributes to specific psychiatric phenotypes, with an emphasis on immuno-metabolic depression. Furthermore, we examine how genomic information can be leveraged to enhance individual-level prediction of at-risk subjects, moving beyond static polygenic risk scores toward biologically informed metrics such as expression-based polygenic scores. We propose a lifespan framework that integrates metabolic, neurobiological, and genomics to advance precision prevention.
-
2. Toward a Unified Theory of Group Connection.
2. 走向群体连接的统一理论PMID:日期:2026-09-29Behavioral scientists have long been struck by the human tendency to connect with other individuals and groups. Three major approaches to group connection have been advanced: () the social cohesion approach, () the social identity approach, and () identity fusion theory. While each approach has garnered support, no one has attempted to integrate them. We address the need for integration by proposing a general theoretical framework that specifies the unique contributions of each approach, identifies the psychological phenomena each best explains, and reconciles theoretical inconsistencies. We then propose a network model that spells out how different aspects of the self-concept, in accordance with key insights from the three approaches, engender group connection.
-
3. Language Access and Hemispheric Specialization: A Network Neuroscience Framework for Typical and Atypical Language Development.
3. 语言获取与半球专门化：典型与非典型语言发展的网络神经科学框架PMID:日期:2026-09-29Neural plasticity in early life underpins the emergence of hemispheric specialization, including left-lateralized networks commonly involved in language. In typical development, neural organization becomes progressively more efficient and specialized across hemispheres, with trajectories shaped by early sensory input and linked to later language outcomes. Because human neuroimaging evidence supports a role for language experience across sensory modalities in shaping neural organization, early sensorineural hearing loss provides a model system for disentangling how sensory and language environments independently influence experience-dependent plasticity. Even when overall brain organization is preserved, early sensory deprivation is associated with altered developmental trajectories of hemispheric specialization. Critically, sensory deprivation does not inevitably result in atypical language or neural development, underscoring an important theoretical distinction between auditory and language deprivation. This review integrates findings from neural, behavioral, and clinical research to propose a framework for understanding how early sensory and language experiences shape language-related developmental outcomes.
-
4. Culture and Emotion Regulation.
4. 文化与情绪调节PMID:日期:2026-09-29Emotion regulation involves attempts to influence emotional expressions or experiences. The nature of emotion regulation depends on people's values and theories of emotion, which vary by culture. We argue that there exist distinct cultural differences in the regulation of emotional expressions and of emotional experiences. People in more interdependent cultures (e.g., East Asian cultures) may be more motivated to regulate emotional expressions than people in more independent cultures (e.g., US culture), but the opposite may be true for regulating emotional experiences. Because interdependent cultures prioritize what happens between people, regulating emotional expressions, which happen between people, is prioritized. The "right" expressions in such cultures are typically of low intensity. In contrast, because independent cultures prioritize what happens within people, regulating emotional experiences, which happen within people, may be prioritized. The "right" experiences in such cultures are typically high in pleasure and low in displeasure. These priorities elicit different motivations, strategies, and implications of emotion regulation across cultures.
-
5. A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Effects of Stress on Epigenetic Aging.
PMID:日期:2026-09-29Stress is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of aging-related health outcomes, yet the pathways linking stress to epigenetic aging remain ill-defined. Here, we outline a multilevel conceptual framework of stress, where stressors interact with resilience (e.g., emotion regulation, social support) and vulnerability to shape acute and repeated or sustained stress responses that mediate long-term aging trajectories. In the context of this framework, we evaluate the evidence across childhood adversity, traumatic events, chronic stressors, and social determinants of health and identify generally consistent effects of stressors on increased epigenetic age in second- and third-generation clocks, which are moderated by resilience and vulnerability. We find clear evidence for mediation of these effects via maladaptive behavioral stress responses as well as more nuanced results suggesting links between maladaptive psychological and physiological stress response pathways and increased epigenetic age. We conclude with recommendations to harmonize stress measurement, analytic approaches, and clock selection using this conceptual framework to advance our mechanistic understanding of the relationship between stress and epigenetic aging.
-
6. Revisiting the Queen Bee Phenomenon: Understanding Self-Group Distancing in Women and Other Groups as Strategic Compliance Within Unequal Systems.
6. 重新审视蜂后现象：将女性及其他群体中的自我群体疏离理解为不平等体系中的策略性顺从PMID:日期:2026-09-24The Queen Bee phenomenon (QBP), whereby senior women in male-dominated contexts distance themselves from junior women, align with masculine norms, and downplay gender inequality, has sparked considerable debate. This contribution reviews evidence for the QBP and argues that it reflects a way of coping with gendered organizational contexts and constrained advancement opportunities that elicit social identity threat and related motives. This contribution provides a multilevel synthesis of the consequences of QBP for individuals, their colleagues, marginalized groups, and organizations. The QBP is conceptualized as a socially embedded, context-dependent, self-reinforcing feedback loop: coping responses that may yield short-term individual benefits but undermine solidarity, legitimize inequality, and reduce pressure for structural change. Integrating insights from psychology, organizational behavior, sociology, and critical diversity research, the QBP is situated alongside related coping strategies, including code-switching, identity bifurcation, and assimilation. These dynamics point to the importance of fixing systems rather than individuals, highlighting implications for research and organizational change.
-
7. Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom.
7. 驾驭未知：智慧的社会文化与元认知架构PMID:日期:2026-08-17Psychological wisdom research has shifted from characterizing rare exemplars and desired outcomes to specifying processes that support sound judgment under uncertainty. Yet it has advanced along two siloed research tracks: one on folk theories-cultural tools such as exemplars, narratives, heuristics (including proverbs and maxims), and standards of judgment-and the other on the mechanisms involved in wise judgment. This review bridges these research tracks using a situated metacognitive lens: Folk theories provide candidate attributes or strategies for action, whereas perspectival metacognition-the capacity to recognize epistemic limits, coordinate viewpoints, and track uncertainty and change-regulates their context-sensitive selection and use. We synthesize evidence connecting wisdom-related processes to emotional balance, relational well-being, cooperation, and reduced polarization, while noting boundary conditions. We show how this synthesis sharpens measurement trade-offs, highlighting the limits of global self-report and the advances in situated assessment. Finally, we summarize work on wisdom development and cultivation and consider the socioecological implications of wisdom research in an AI-shaped world.
-
8. From Prompts to Constructs: A Dual-Validity Framework for Large Language Model Research in Psychology.
8. 从提示到构念：心理学中大型语言模型研究的双重效度框架PMID:日期:2026-08-10[中文摘要] 大型语言模型（LLMs）正作为工具和研究对象进入心理学研究。然而，许多研究将人类测量工具应用于LLMs，却未确立其输出的可靠性或可解释性，从而带来了测量幻影的风险——即把统计规律误认为真实现象。本综述认为，稳健的AI心理学研究需要整合两种方法论传统：对分数含义的心理测量学验证，以及对结果所支持结论的因果推断标准。文章提出了一个双重效度框架，其中证据要求随科学雄心的提升而递增：从工具使用，到行为刻画、人类模拟，再到认知建模。对文本进行分类可能仅需准确性和可靠性；而声称LLM模拟焦虑或阐明认知机制，则需要额外证据，包括构念效度证据和实验控制。进展取决于开发心理构念的计算类似物，而非假定人类测量工具会自动适用于语言模型。
[英文摘要] Large language models (LLMs) are entering psychological research both as tools and as objects of inquiry. Yet many studies apply human instruments to LLMs without establishing that the outputs are reliable or interpretable, raising the risk of measurement phantoms-statistical regularities mistaken for genuine psychological phenomena. This review argues that robust AI psychological research requires integrating two methodological traditions: psychometric validation of what a score means and causal inference standards for what the results warrant. It develops a dual-validity framework in which evidentiary demands scale with scientific ambition: from tool use through behavioral characterization and human simulation to cognitive modeling. Classifying text may require only accuracy and reliability; claiming that an LLM simulates anxiety or illuminates cognitive mechanisms requires additional evidence, including construct validity evidence and experimental controls. Progress depends on developing computational analogs of psychological constructs rather than assuming human measures automatically apply to language models.
-
9. The Psychology of Question Asking: A Comprehensive Review.
9. 提问心理学：综合评述PMID:日期:2026-08-07[中文摘要] 提问是人类交流的基本方面，也是信息寻求行为中不可或缺的组成部分。我们深入探讨提问理论的复杂图景，探索其与早期发展、人工智能和教育等众多领域的多元交叉。综合数十年来不同领域关于提问的研究，我们提出“信息寻求中的提问”（Question Asking in Information Seeking，QuInS）框架。QuInS为驱动提问探究的迭代性、动态性过程提供了统一视角。我们考察提问的幼儿期起源、探究理论，以及问题在促进创造力、学习、问题解决和社会情境中的作用。最后，我们探讨近期的计算进展如何有助于构建问题并对其进行实证评估。鉴于提问在日常生活中无处不在，阐明其本质及其在识别和填补知识缺口中的机制性作用至关重要。这样的努力将推动我们成为更高效、更有成效且更具创造性的学习者和提问者。
[英文摘要] Question asking, a foundational aspect of human communication, is an integral part of information-seeking behavior. We delve into the complex landscape of question-asking theories, exploring their diverse intersections with a myriad of fields-such as early development, artificial intelligence, and education. Synthesizing decades of research on question asking across different domains, we introduce the Question Asking in Information Seeking (QuInS) framework. QuInS provides a unified perspective on the iterative, dynamic processes that drive inquiry through question asking. We examine the early childhood origins of question asking, theories of inquiry, and the role of questions in fostering creativity, learning, problem solving, and social contexts. Finally, we explore how recent computational advancements contribute to formulate and empirically assess questions. Given the ubiquity of question asking in daily life, it is critical to elucidate its nature and mechanistic role in identifying and filling knowledge gaps. Such an endeavor will drive us to be more efficient, effective, and creative learners and question askers.
-
10. Behavior Change.
10. 行为改变PMID:日期:2026-08-07[中文摘要] 改变行为是横跨健康、金融、投票和教育等诸多领域的核心挑战。本综述基于心理学及相关领域数十年的研究，综合高质量证据——尤其是具有客观行为结局的随机对照试验——以识别改变行为的有效策略。我们提出一个统一的三阶段框架，将行为改变概念化为一个涉及以下阶段的过程：（）建立动机，（）坚持执行，（）形成持久习惯。针对每个阶段，我们识别关键的心理挑战，并综述旨在克服这些挑战的干预措施。通过将大量且分散的文献组织在一个连贯的框架内，本综述旨在阐明行为改变干预措施何时以及为何成功，并为更有效、以行为科学为依据的政策与实践提供参考。
[英文摘要] Changing behavior is a central challenge in domains ranging from health and finance to voting and education. Drawing on decades of research from psychology and related fields, this review synthesizes high-quality evidence-particularly randomized controlled trials with objective behavioral outcomes-to identify effective strategies for changing behavior. We propose a unifying three-phase framework that conceptualizes behavior change as a process involving: () building motivation, () following through, and () forming durable habits. For each phase, we identify key psychological challenges and review interventions designed to overcome them. By organizing a large and fragmented literature within a coherent framework, this review aims to clarify when and why behavior change interventions succeed and to inform more effective, behaviorally informed policies and practices.