JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY人格杂志
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY(英文缩写 J PERS),ISSN 0022-3506,eISSN 1467-6494,中文译名:人格杂志 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。
发文量统计区间：2025-09-28 至 2026-09-28，按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。
期刊介绍
历年影响因子趋势
| JCR 数据年份 | 影响因子 | JCR 分区 |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 5.429 | Q1 |
| 2022 | 5.000 | Q1 |
| 2023 | 3.200 | Q1 |
| 2024 | 2.700 | Q2 |
| 2025 | 3.300 | Q1 |
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 最新收录文献
-
1. Network Analysis of Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM) and Other Self Report Measures of Psychopathy.
PMID:日期:2026-10-01Network analysis is a statistical tool for understanding interrelations between symptoms and the relative importance of symptoms in a disorder. This is especially appealing to psychopathy researchers, as network analysis may provide some insights that bring the field closer to resolving debates about psychopathy-relevant features. In the present study (N = 612), we first conducted network analysis on the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM) and subsequently conducted a scale-level analysis of psychopathic traits from seven psychopathy inventories. In the TriPM network, we found that items from Meanness and Disinhibition were among the most central. Meanness items assessing deficits in empathy were highly influential nodes in the network, but also demonstrated significant topological overlap. Boldness items were less central but still important to the TriPM network. Scales indexing impulse control problems, affective deficits, and interpersonal dominance were among the most influential in the domain-level network. This included measures of callousness, impulsiveness, and need for stimulation, and grandiosity and manipulativeness. Despite concerns about the application of network analysis to cross-sectional data, our results support the relevance of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition to the conceptualization and measurement of psychopathy.
-
2. Loneliness and Personality: Noise- and Bias-Free True Correlations Between Loneliness and the Big Five Personality Domains.
PMID:日期:2026-10-01While loneliness is intertwined with many mental and physical health problems, its origins are not yet well understood. We sought to better understand its link to personality in a large national cohort. Combining self- and informant ratings in multiple samples, we conducted the largest study to date to examine loneliness' true correlations (rs) with the Big Five personality traits, free of single-method biases and transient and random errors. Across three samples (Estonian-speaking, N = 20,893; Russian-speaking, N = 762; English-speaking, N = 599), we found a strong relationship between loneliness and Neuroticism (r = 0.60-0.70). Loneliness also had robust but much weaker associations with Extraversion (r = -0.20 to -0.30), and only weak associations (r = 0.10 to -0.20) with Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness. Collectively, the Big Five accounted for over 50% of loneliness variance. In a subsample, the associations were only slightly smaller longitudinally over approximately 10 years. Overall, feeling lonely is more closely related to Neuroticism than previously understood, and the association endures over time.
-
3. Forgivingness Across Social Relationships and Family Generations Over Time.
PMID:日期:2026-10-01This study addressed individual differences in forgivingness, or the tendency to forgive others, across multiple social relationships and family generations over time. We used longitudinal data over 4 years across three family generations, including young adults (n = 501; M = 20.4 years), their parents (n = 350; M = 50.9 years), and grandparents (n = 199; M = 76.1 years). Participants were asked to respond on their willingness to forgive the other two generations, as well as their romantic partner and friends. Multilevel modeling was employed to examine how forgivingness differed within persons, family, and generations, as well as over time. Individual differences in forgivingness were explained by the respondent (62.4%), the social relationship (24.7%), the family (9.6%), and the generation (3.3%). Forgivingness differed depending on the social relationship, with a greater willingness to forgive grandparents and grandchildren. Forgivingness also differed by generation, with the middle and older generations being more forgiving than young adults. Finally, the overall forgivingness increased over time. The current findings emphasize the importance of contextualizing forgivingness across social relationships and family generations.
-
4. Change Within Stability: A Mixed-Methods Study of Identity Development in Established Adulthood.
PMID:日期:2026-10-01Longitudinal studies examining identity development in adulthood are scarce, and little is known about the processes through which a stable identity is maintained or revised. This study addresses these gaps by examining (a) longitudinal patterns of identity status development from emerging through established adulthood and (b) processes of continued identity development among individuals who are stable in committed identity statuses. Quantitative analyses of identity status development across ages 25, 29, 33, and 39 (N = 105) revealed group-level changes, with more individuals in identity achievement and fewer in moratorium and identity diffusion at age 39 than at younger ages. However, the largest group of participants (35%, n = 37) were assigned the same committed identity status at all four time points. Longitudinal qualitative analysis of this subset from ages 33 and 39 resulted in a model with three processes of continued identity development: anchoring commitments in views of oneself, story integration, and connecting oneself to older and younger generations. The findings show that there is identity status change toward maturity from emerging through established adulthood, and that processes of continued development take place for individuals considered stable in their identity.
-
5. Strategy-Situation Fit of Proactive Emotion Regulation and the Role of Personality.
PMID:日期:2026-10-01Research on emotion regulation has primarily focused on reactive strategies, while proactive emotion regulation remains less understood. This study investigates proactive emotion regulation through situation selection, where individuals deliberately choose environments to promote desirable emotional outcomes, and examines how this strategy adapts to contextual demands (strategy-situation fit). We reanalyzed an ambulatory assessment dataset comprising 179 participants and 29,956 momentary observations to test preregistered hypotheses about context sensitivity, strategy-situation fit, and personality predictors. Results supported our hypotheses: (a) participants showed greater situation selection when experiencing higher-than-usual momentary affective well-being, indicating context sensitivity; (b) this context-sensitive strategy use was linked to improved overall affective well-being, demonstrating adaptive strategy-situation fit; and (c) higher levels of personality plasticity, but not stability, predicted better strategy-situation fit. These findings underscore the adaptive potential of situation selection and highlight personality's role, particularly plasticity, in shaping anticipatory regulatory processes. The results inform refinement of emotion regulation theories and suggest avenues for tailoring interventions to individual differences in emotion regulation tendencies.
-
6. Weapon or Armor? Unpacking the Paradox of Narcissism and Self-Reported Mental Health Through a Three-Level Meta-Analysis.
PMID:日期:2026-10-01This meta-analysis examined the relationships between different dimensions of narcissism and mental health, with a specific focus on internalizing forms of psychopathology. A systematic search identified 229 empirical studies (N = 185,137; k = 735 effect sizes) from four international databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, OATD) and two Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang Data). Because most studies relied on self-report measures, the findings primarily reflect self-reported associations. Random-effects models were used to estimate overall effects, and moderation analyses tested the roles of demographic, methodological, and construct-related variables. Grandiose narcissism was positively associated with positive mental health (r = 0.19, p < 0.001) and showed no significant association with negative mental health (r = 0.02, p = 0.26). Vulnerable narcissism was negatively associated with positive mental health (r = -0.25, p < 0.001) and positively associated with negative mental health (r = 0.39, p < 0.001). Findings based on the Admiration-Rivalry model and the three-factor model provided additional clarity regarding these associations. Significant moderators included age, measurement instruments, and construct specificity. These results clarify dimension-specific links between narcissism and mental health and provide a more nuanced understanding of narcissism's psychological correlates. PROSPERO: Registration No. CRD420251016464.
-
7. Causal Effect of Psychopathy on Partner Well-Being: A National Longitudinal Study.
PMID:日期:2026-10-01Psychopathy is associated with harmful behaviors in romantic relationships, but its causal effect on partner well-being remains elusive. Across two studies, we apply robust observational methods for causal inference with national-scale dyadic data to examine how psychopathic personality and its facets affect partner well-being over time. In Study 1 (three waves; N = 1012), we examined how increasing global psychopathy and its facets within individuals affects their partner's well-being one year later. In Study 2 (six waves; N = 1832), we investigated how increasing global psychopathy and its facets over multiple years would affect partner well-being. Study 1 indicates that psychopathic personality increases partners' perceived relationship conflict and anxiety in the short term but also bolsters partner self-esteem. Study 2 reveals that, over the longer term, psychopathic personality intensifies partners' perceived relationship conflict and depression and reduces partner self-esteem, relationship satisfaction, and personal well-being. Taken together, it is the convergence of psychopathic traits, rather than individual facets, that cause greater harm to partners, with the magnitude of harm intensifying over time. This research demonstrates the power of combining dyadic panel data with causal inference methods to address questions of psychological interest inaccessible to experiments.
-
8. Promotion- or Prevention-Focused Self-Evaluation and the Preferential Pursuit of More Desirable Romantic Partners.
PMID:日期:2026-10-01This research examined how self-regulatory orientations-promotion focus (growth) and prevention focus (security)-influence individuals' evaluation of their own desirable traits and their pursuit of highly desirable romantic partners. Two studies analyzed participants' evaluations of themselves and romantic partners: Study 1 followed 208 college students longitudinally across 7 months of early romantic interest development; Study 2 observed 187 participants in live speed-dating events. Participants' regulatory focus, self-perceptions, partner ideals, and the desirability of pursued partners were assessed, controlling for self-esteem and consensus ratings of participants' own desirability. Stronger promotion concerns predicted overly positive self-evaluations and pursuit of more desirable partners, whereas stronger prevention concerns predicted overly negative self-evaluations and pursuit of less desirable partners. These effects persisted after accounting for self-esteem and consensus ratings of participants' desirability and were partially mediated by participants' own self-perceptions and partner ideals. Findings suggest that regulatory focus influences aspirations for highly desirable partners through exaggerations of positive or negative self-perceptions that then influence aspirations for and willingness to pursue more or less subjectively and objectively desirable partners. Promotion and prevention mindsets thus appear to play a unique self-regulatory role in romantic partner selection beyond general self-esteem or objective desirability.
-
9. Is Virtue Good for You?
PMID:日期:2026-10-01Does virtue benefit its possessor, or is it beneficial for others but not the self? We tested two highly influential theories that offer contradictory answers. In particular, we focused on three "hard cases" for the theory that virtue promotes well-being-that is, three virtues that aren't obviously enjoyable (compassion, patience, and self-control). Two preregistered studies (total N = 43,164 observations; N = 1218 participants) tested for within- and between-person associations between each virtue and well-being. Study 1 used experience sampling with adolescents. Study 2 used the day reconstruction method with United States adults. Study 1 found positive links across the board. Study 2 found positive within- and between-person links with eudaimonic well-being, but more complex associations with affective well-being. Study 2 also revealed that situations that afford opportunities to exercise these virtues are challenging and unpleasant. However, exercising compassion, patience, and self-control seems to help people cope with these challenges. These findings contradict the theory that virtue is good for others but not for the self, aligning with the theory that being good leads to being well. They also provide preliminary evidence about how virtues like compassion, patience, and self-control might benefit their possessors.
-
10. (In)congruence Between Justice Beliefs and Justice Experiences Predicts Adolescents' Prosocial Behaviors: Response Surface Analysis.
PMID:日期:2026-10-01Literature shows that justice beliefs and justice experience (peer victimization) shape adolescent prosociality. However, how adolescents react to the (in)congruence between justice beliefs and justice experiences in peer environments remains unclear. We utilized response surface analysis to examine how belief-experience justice (in)congruence affects adolescents' prosocial behaviors. Study 1 with a cross-sectional design (N = 2963, M = 15.86 ± 0.72, 40.0% girls) showed that, generally, adolescents with stronger justice beliefs and more justice experiences were more likely to engage in global prosocial behaviors, which increased with the belief-experience justice fit; when adolescents encountered belief-experience justice conflicts, their beliefs played a more crucial role than experiences in driving prosocial actions. Study 2 with two-wave data (N = 3038, M = 16.83 ± 0.79, 53.6% girls) essentially replicated the cross-sectional pattern in Study 1 and further found that adolescents' beliefs no longer dominantly promoted prosociality seven months later under belief-experience conflicts. Moreover, boys and girls behave differently depending on prosocial contexts, especially according to situational visibility. These findings demonstrate that even in unjust peer environments, adolescents' justice beliefs are resilient enough to guide them toward current prosocial actions, which yet would fade over time.