GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW乔治·华盛顿法律评论
GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW(英文缩写 GEORGE WASH LAW REV),ISSN 0016-8076,eISSN 0016-8076,中文译名:乔治·华盛顿法律评论 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。
发文量统计区间：2025-11-01 至 2026-10-31，按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。
期刊介绍
历年影响因子趋势
| JCR 数据年份 | 影响因子 | JCR 分区 |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1.548 | Q2 |
| 2022 | 1.500 | Q2 |
| 2023 | 1.600 | Q1 |
| 2024 | 1.500 | Q1 |
| 2025 | 1.300 | Q2 |
GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW 最新收录文献
-
1. Disentangling privacy from property: toward a deeper understanding of genetic privacy.
PMID:日期:2004-04With the mapping of the human genome, genetic privacy has become a concern to many. People care about genetic privacy because genes play an important role in shaping us--our genetic information is about us, and it is deeply connected to our sense of ourselves. In addition, unwanted disclosure of our genetic information, like a great deal of other personal information, makes us vulnerable to unwanted exposure, stigmatization, and discrimination. One recent approach to protecting genetic privacy is to create property rights in genetic information. This Article argues against that approach. Privacy and property are fundamentally different concepts. At heart, the term "property" connotes control within the marketplace and over something that is disaggregated or alienable from the self. "Privacy," in contrast, connotes control over access to the self as well as things close to, intimately connected to, and about the self. Given these different meanings, a regime of property rights in genetic information would impoverish our understanding of that information, ourselves, and the relationships we hope will be built around and through its disclosure. This Article explores our interests in genetic information in order to deepen our understanding of the ongoing discourse about the distinction between property and privacy. It develops a conception of genetic privacy with a strong relational component. We ordinarily share genetic information in the context of relationships in which disclosure is important to the relationship--family, intimate, doctor-patient, researcher-participant, employer-employee, and insurer-insured relationships. Such disclosure makes us vulnerable to and dependent on the person to whom we disclose it. As a result, trust is essential to the integrity of these relationships and our sharing of genetic information. Genetic privacy can protect our vulnerability in these relationships and enhance the trust we hope to have in them. Property, in contrast, by connoting commodification, disaggregation, and arms-length dealings, can negatively affect the self and harm these relationships. This Article concludes that a deeper understanding of genetic privacy calls for remedies for privacy violations that address dignitary harm and breach of trust, as opposed to market harms, as the property model suggests.
-
8. The phenomenon of antique laws: can a state revive old abortion laws in a new era?
PMID:日期:1989-11该文献暂无摘要。
-
9. Increasing the supply of transplant organs: the virtues of a futures market.
PMID:日期:1989-11该文献暂无摘要。