EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE实验农业

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE(英文缩写 EXP AGR),ISSN 0014-4797,eISSN 1469-4441,中文译名:实验农业 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。

2026 年数据 · 影响因子
2.600
JCR 分区
Q2
CAS 分区
B4
近一年发文量
0
本站 PubMed 收录统计

发文量统计区间:2025-09-27 至 2026-09-27,按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。

ISSN: 0014-4797 · eISSN: 1469-4441 · 缩写: EXP AGR ·中文: 实验农业

期刊介绍

选择期刊介绍栏目

期刊简介

《Experimental Agriculture》是一本聚焦农业科学实证研究的国际期刊,主要发表田间试验、作物生产与农业系统管理方面的原创成果。内容涵盖作物生理、土壤肥力、农艺措施及可持续农业等方向,读者群为农业科研人员、推广专家与高年级学生。该刊强调数据驱动的结论,对试验设计与统计分析要求较高,适合有完整田间或温室试验数据的作者投稿。

研究方向

主要方向包括作物栽培与生理、土壤-作物互作、养分与水管理、病虫害综合防治、耕作制度及农业生态学。论文类型以原创研究为主,兼有综述和短通讯,要求基于田间或控制环境试验,关注产量、品质及环境效应,鼓励跨学科和长期定位试验研究。

期刊特色

研究取向偏重应用与实证,强调试验可重复性和统计严谨性,论文通常包含多地点或多年度数据。适合农业院校、研究所及推广机构的研究者,尤其是从事作物生产、土壤管理和农业可持续发展的人员。对纯理论或缺乏田间验证的稿件兴趣有限。

投稿难度

投稿难度中等偏上,对试验设计、数据完整性和统计方法要求较严。建议在投稿前完善试验重复与对照设置,清晰呈现方差分析或混合模型结果,并讨论结果的区域适用性。若数据仅来自单点单季,需补充机理分析或文献对比以增强说服力。

历年影响因子趋势

JCR 数据年份影响因子JCR 分区
20212.234Q2
20221.600Q3
20241.900Q2
20252.600Q2

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE 最新收录文献

  1. JCR分区: Q2 CAS分区: B4 影响因子: 2.6

    1. LEGUME-MAIZE ROTATION OR RELAY? OPTIONS FOR ECOLOGICAL INTENSIFICATION OF SMALLHOLDER FARMS IN THE GUINEA SAVANNA OF NORTHERN GHANA.

    作者:
    M Kermah, A C Franke, B D K Ahiabor, S Adjei-Nsiah, R C Abaidoo, K E Giller
    日期:
    2019-01-01

    Soil nutrient constraints coupled with erratic rainfall have led to poor crop yields and occasionally to crop failure in sole cropping in the Guinea savanna of West Africa. We explored different maize-grain legume diversification and intensification options that can contribute to mitigating risks of crop failure, increase crop productivity under different soil fertility levels, while improving soil fertility due to biological N-fixation by the legume. There were four relay patterns with cowpea sown first and maize sown at least 2 weeks after sowing (WAS) cowpea; two relay patterns with maize sown first and cowpea sown at least 3 WAS maize in different spatial arrangements. These were compared with groundnut-maize, soybean-maize, fallow-maize and continuous maize rotations in fields high, medium and poor in fertility at a site each in the southern (SGS) and northern (NGS) Guinea savanna of northern Ghana. Legumes grown in the poorly fertile fields relied more on N-fixation for growth leading to generally larger net N inputs to the soil. Crop yields declined with decreasing soil fertility and were larger in the SGS than in the NGS due to more favourable rainfall and soil fertility. Spatial arrangements of relay intercrops did not have any significant impact on maize and legume grain yields. Sowing maize first followed by a cowpea relay resulted in 0.18-0.26 t ha-1 reduction in cowpea grain yield relative to cowpea sown from the onset. Relaying maize into cowpea led to a 0.29-0.64 t ha-1 reduction in maize grain yield relative to maize sown from the onset in the SGS. In the NGS, a decline of 0.66 and 0.82 t ha-1 in maize grain yield relative to maize sown from the onset was observed due to less rainfall received by the relay maize. Groundnut and soybean induced 0.38-1.01 t ha-1 more grain yield of a subsequent maize relative to continuous maize, and 1.17-1.71 t ha-1 more yield relative to relay maize across both sites. Accumulated crop yields over both years suggest that sowing maize first followed by cowpea relay is a promising ecological intensification option besides the more common legume-maize rotation in the Guinea savanna, as it was comparable with soybean-maize rotation and more productive than the other treatments.

  2. JCR分区: Q2 CAS分区: B4 影响因子: 2.6

    2. VARIETAL IDENTIFICATION IN HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS: RESULTS FROM THREE HOUSEHOLD-BASED METHODS AGAINST THE BENCHMARK OF DNA FINGERPRINTING IN SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA.

    作者:
    FrÉdÉric Kosmowski, Abiyot Aragaw, Andrzej Kilian, Alemayehu Ambel, John Ilukor, Biratu Yigezu, James Stevenson
    日期:
    2019-01-01

    Accurate crop varietal identification is the backbone of any high-quality assessment of outcomes and impacts. Sweetpotato () varieties have important nutritional differences, and there is a strong interest to identify nutritionally superior varieties for dissemination. In agricultural household surveys, such information is often collected based on the farmer's self-report. In this article, we present the results of a data capture experiment on sweet potato varietal identification in southern Ethiopia. Three household-based methods of identifying varietal adoption are tested against the benchmark of DNA fingerprinting: (A) Elicitation from farmers with basic questions for the most widely planted variety; (B) Farmer elicitation on five sweet potato phenotypic attributes by showing a visual-aid protocol; and (C) Enumerator recording observations on five sweet potato phenotypic attributes using a visual-aid protocol and visiting the field. In total, 20% of farmers identified a variety as improved when in fact it was local and 19% identified a variety as local when it was in fact improved. The variety names given by farmers delivered inconsistent and inaccurate varietal identities. Visual-aid protocols employed in methods B and C were better than those in method A, but greatly underestimated the adoption estimates given by the DNA fingerprinting method. Our results suggest that estimating the adoption of improved varieties with methods based on farmer self-reports is questionable and point towards a wider use of DNA fingerprinting in adoption and impact assessments.

  3. JCR分区: Q2 CAS分区: B4 影响因子: 2.6

    3. DOES SIZE MATTER? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF META-ANALYSIS IN AGRONOMY.

    作者:
    Timothy J Krupnik, Jens A Andersson, Leonard Rusinamhodzi, Marc Corbeels, Carol Shennan, Bruno GÉrard
    日期:
    2019-01-01

    Intended to test broad hypotheses and arrive at unifying conclusions, meta-analysis is the process of extracting, assembling, and analyzing large quantities of data from multiple publications to increase statistical power and uncover explanatory patterns. This paper describes the ways in which meta-analysis has been applied to support claims and counter-claims regarding two topics widely debated in agricultural research, namely organic agriculture (OA) and conservation agriculture (CA). We describe the origins of debate for each topic and assess prominent meta-analyses considering data-selection criteria, research question framing, and the interpretation and extrapolation of meta-analytical results. Meta-analyses of OA and CA are also examined in the context of the political economy of development-oriented agricultural research. Does size matter? We suggest that it does, although somewhat ironically. While meta-analysis aims to pool all relevant studies and generate comprehensive databases from which broad insights can be drawn, our case studies suggest that the organization of many meta-analyses may affect the generalizability and usefulness of research results. The politicized nature of debates over OA and CA also appear to affect the divergent ways in which meta-analytical results may be interpreted and extrapolated in struggles over the legitimacy of both practices. Rather than resolving scientific contestation, these factors appear to contribute to the ongoing debate. Meta-analysis is nonetheless becoming increasingly popular with agricultural researchers attracted by the power for the statistical inference offered by large datasets. This paper consequently offers three suggestions for how scientists and readers of scientific literature can more carefully evaluate meta-analyses. First, the ways in which papers and data are collected should be critically assessed. Second, the justification of research questions, framing of farming systems, and the scales at which research results are extrapolated and discussed should be carefully evaluated. Third, when applied to strongly politicized topics situated in an arena of scientific debate, as is the case with OA and CA, more conservative interpretations of meta-analytical results that recognize the socially and politically embedded nature of agricultural research is are needed.

  4. JCR分区: Q2 CAS分区: B4 影响因子: 2.6

    4. PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE OF FOUR COMMON BEAN ROOT ROTS IN UGANDA.

    作者:
    P Paparu, A Acur, F Kato, C Acam, J Nakibuule, S Musoke, S Nkalubo, C Mukankusi
    日期:
    2017-01-01

    Root rots are one of the main biotic constraints to common bean ( L.) production, causing losses estimated at 221 000 metric tons a year in sub-Saharan Africa. Until recently, root rots in Ugandan common bean agroecologies were mostly caused by and spp., especially in high altitude areas. But now, severe root rots are observed in low and medium altitude agroecologies characterized by dry and warm conditions. The objective of our study was therefore to ascertain the current prevalence and incidence of common bean root rot diseases in Ugandan common bean agroecologies. Our results show that root rots were present in all seven agroecologies surveyed. Overall, the most rampant root rot was southern blight caused by Sacc., followed by root rots caused by spp., spp. and , respectively. Our study clearly showed the influence of environmental conditions on the prevalence and incidence of common bean root rots. While Fusarium and Pythium root rots are favoured under low air temperature and high air humidity in highland areas, high incidence of southern blight is favoured by warm and moist conditions of lowland areas. The prevalence and incidence of common bean root rots was mapped, providing a reliable baseline for future studies. Similarly, hotspots identified for common bean root rots will be a very useful resource for evaluation of germplasm and breeding lines for resistance to root rots.

在 EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE 中搜索更多文献

支持中英文检索 · 智能翻译 · 影响因子 · PDF 下载 · AI 文献阅读

指标接近的期刊