EDUCATIONAL REVIEW教育评论

EDUCATIONAL REVIEW(英文缩写 EDUC REV),ISSN 0013-1911,eISSN 1465-3397,中文译名:教育评论 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。

2026 年数据 · 影响因子
3.800
JCR 分区
Q1
CAS 分区
B2
近一年发文量
0
本站 PubMed 收录统计

发文量统计区间:2025-11-01 至 2026-10-31,按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。

ISSN: 0013-1911 · eISSN: 1465-3397 · 缩写: EDUC REV ·中文: 教育评论

期刊介绍

选择期刊介绍栏目

期刊简介

《Educational Review》是一本国际性教育研究期刊,关注教育政策、实践与理论之间的对话。其内容覆盖课程与教学、教师教育、教育公平、比较教育及教育社会学等广泛议题,常刊发基于实证研究的论文和批判性综述。读者群包括教育研究者、教师教育者、政策分析人员及研究生,适合希望了解国际教育研究前沿动态并参与跨语境讨论的学者。

研究方向

主要研究方向包括教育政策分析、课程与教学改革、教师专业发展、教育公平与多样性、比较与国际教育、教育社会学及教育评估。论文类型以实证研究、理论探讨和系统性综述为主,也接受方法学讨论与批判性评论,强调研究对教育实践和政策的启示。

期刊特色

该刊重视研究设计的严谨性与论证的批判性,偏好具有国际视野或跨文化比较价值的稿件,鼓励作者清晰阐明理论框架与方法论。论文通常要求对教育实践或政策有明确意涵。适合教育学科研究者、教师教育工作者及关注教育改革的政策研究者阅读与投稿。

投稿难度

投稿难度中等偏上,对理论深度、方法透明度和英文表达均有较高要求。建议在投稿前明确研究问题与既有文献的对话关系,完善研究设计与数据呈现,并请同行预审语言和论证逻辑。不能仅凭分区或指标判断录用可能性,需结合论文与期刊范围的匹配度综合评估。

历年影响因子趋势

JCR 数据年份影响因子JCR 分区
20213.829Q1
20223.300Q2
20233.100Q1
20243.400Q1
20253.800Q1

EDUCATIONAL REVIEW 最新收录文献

  1. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B2 影响因子: 3.8

    1. Stakeholder perspectives on primary school pupils and sickness absence - exploring opportunities and challenges.

    1. 利益相关者对小学生和因病缺勤的看法——探索机遇与挑战
    作者:
    Esther K Pijl, Yvonne T M Vanneste, Frans J M Feron, Jolanda J P Mathijssen, Angelique E de Rijk
    日期:
    2021-10-27

    School absenteeism and its underlying causes can have negative effects on the cognitive, psychosocial and health development of a child. Research in primary education shows high rates of sickness absence. Many stakeholders are involved in addressing school absenteeism, including primary school professionals, child and youth healthcare physicians, school attendance officers and parents. This study explores these stakeholders' perspectives, their approaches and what they envisage to be necessary in order to improve. It also aims to unveil opportunities and challenges in addressing sickness absence among primary school pupils. Qualitative research was performed with six semi-structured focus group interviews and involving 27 participants from the West-Brabant and Amsterdam regions of the Netherlands. Thematic analysis was used. The overarching theme was aiming for the child's wellbeing. Each focus group interview started with low awareness of sickness absence as a threat to this wellbeing, but awareness grew during the interviews. The participating stakeholders regarded problematic sickness absence as complex due to a wide variety of causes, and felt that each other's expertise was necessary to reduce sickness absence. Schools registered absence, but only occasionally used planned steps; they based the identification of problematic sickness on gut feeling rather than any agreed-upon criteria. To be able to systematically address sickness absence and thus improve the wellbeing of children, stakeholders felt the need for a clearly structured approach, including monitoring of sickness absence of all pupils, identifying problematic absence and promoting collaboration with other stakeholders. An approach should allow for tailoring solutions to the individual child.

  2. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B2 影响因子: 3.8

    2. College Aspirations, Gender Sexuality Alliances, and Teacher Support among Diverse LGBTQ Youth.

    2. 不同LGBTQ青年群体的大学志向、性别性取向联盟与教师支持
    作者:
    Steven Feldman, Ryan J Watson, Connor Gallik
    日期:
    2020-09-17

    Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) youth report hostile school climates and sexuality-based harassment, but scholarship has not clearly documented how these climates might be associated with college aspirations among this population. Given college has become a common aspiration for many high school youths, we sought to explore subgroup differences in college aspirations among LGBTQ youth, and whether or not LGBTQ-specific community factors, such as Gender Sexuality Alliances (GSA) presence and teacher support, were related to college aspirations. To do this, we analyzed a large sample (N = 11,327, Mage = 15.57) of LGBTQ youth from across the United States. We compared college aspirations across subgroups of youth via bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models to explore how school factors (i.e., presence of GSAs and LGBTQ-specific teacher supportiveness) were associated with college aspirations among LGBTQ youth. We found that transgender youth were less likely to aspire to go to college compared to cisgender counterparts. Additionally, more common sexual minority subgroups (e.g., gay/lesbian) were less likely to aspire to go to college compared to their counterparts with more emergent identity labels (e.g., asexual, queer). The presence of GSAs and higher reports of LGBTQ-supportive teachers were associated with increased odds of aspiring to go to college across all LGBTQ youth in our sample. These findings have implications for how schools and teachers prepare sexual and gender minorities for college. The findings imply that LGBTQ populations should not be treated as monolithic in their college readiness, preparation, and aspirations.

在 EDUCATIONAL REVIEW 中搜索更多文献

支持中英文检索 · 智能翻译 · 影响因子 · PDF 下载 · AI 文献阅读

指标接近的期刊