BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES英国教育研究杂志

BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES(英文缩写 BRIT J EDUC STUD),ISSN 0007-1005,eISSN 1467-8527,中文译名:英国教育研究杂志 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。

2026 年数据 · 影响因子
2.500
JCR 分区
Q1
CAS 分区
B3
近一年发文量
0
本站 PubMed 收录统计

发文量统计区间:2025-09-28 至 2026-09-28,按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。

ISSN: 0007-1005 · eISSN: 1467-8527 · 缩写: BRIT J EDUC STUD ·中文: 英国教育研究杂志

期刊介绍

选择期刊介绍栏目

期刊简介

《British Journal of Educational Studies》是英国教育研究领域的重要综合性学术期刊,关注教育政策、教育哲学、教育史及教育社会学等基础性议题。期刊强调对教育问题进行理论化与批判性分析,而非单纯报告实证数据,读者群主要为教育学者、政策研究者及研究生。

研究方向

主要发表教育政策分析、教育哲学与伦理、教育史、比较教育及教育社会学方面的研究。论文类型包括原创研究论文、综述与评论性文章,常围绕英国及国际教育制度、改革争议和理论建构展开讨论。

期刊特色

研究取向偏重理论深度与批判性反思,鼓励跨学科视角和长时段的历史与政策分析。论文通常论证严密、文献扎实,适合教育理论研究者、政策分析人员及关注教育思想演进的高年级学生阅读与投稿。

投稿难度

投稿难度中等偏上,期刊重视选题的理论贡献和论证质量,而非仅看量化指标。建议作者在文献对话、概念框架和批判性讨论上充分打磨,并确保行文符合英式学术写作规范,避免单纯描述性研究。

历年影响因子趋势

JCR 数据年份影响因子JCR 分区
20211.753Q3
20221.900Q3
20231.700Q2
20242.100Q1
20252.500Q1

BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES 最新收录文献

  1. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B3 影响因子: 2.5

    1. Outsourcing Trouble: A Home International Comparison of Alternative Provision Across the UK.

    作者:
    Sally Power, Jemma Bridgeman, Gavin Duffy, Gillean McCluskey, Alice Tawell, Annie Taylor
    日期:
    2025-01-01

    This paper explores the complex landscape of alternative provision across the UK and its implications for school exclusion. Drawing on interviews with over 400 professionals, parents, and pupils in ten selected local authorities in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, we find marked differences in the scale and nature of provision. These differences reflect the UK's diverging political economies of education. England's provision reflects its preference for quasi-market mechanisms. Scotland's reflects a commitment to inclusive education. Wales supports public provision but bears the legacy of historic control by England, while Northern Ireland's landscape is almost entirely publicly provided. The data suggest that the scale and diversity of alternative provision does not reduce school exclusions. England has the highest rates of exclusion and the greater number and diversity of providers. Scotland has lower rates of exclusions and fewer providers. It may even be that the availability of alternative provision creates its own demand. However, the relationship between exclusion rates and alternative provision is not straightforward, nor are its implications for educational parity. The paper concludes by arguing there is a pressing need for research on the opportunity costs of alternative provision for young people and the public sector.

在 BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES 中搜索更多文献

支持中英文检索 · 智能翻译 · 影响因子 · PDF 下载 · AI 文献阅读

指标接近的期刊