Lancet Psychiatry柳叶刀精神病学

Lancet Psychiatry(英文缩写 LANCET PSYCHIAT),ISSN 2215-0366,eISSN 2215-0374,中文译名:柳叶刀精神病学 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。

2026 年数据 · 影响因子
21.100
JCR 分区
Q1
CAS 分区
B1
近一年发文量
229
本站 PubMed 收录统计

发文量统计区间:2025-11-01 至 2026-10-31,按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。

ISSN: 2215-0366 · eISSN: 2215-0374 · 缩写: LANCET PSYCHIAT ·中文: 柳叶刀精神病学

期刊介绍

选择期刊介绍栏目

期刊简介

《Lancet Psychiatry》是柳叶刀系列中专注于精神医学与心理健康领域的国际期刊,发表临床研究、流行病学调查、公共卫生政策分析及评论性文章。内容覆盖精神障碍的预防、诊断、治疗与康复,关注全球精神卫生服务与政策议题。读者群包括精神科医师、临床心理学家、公共卫生研究者、卫生政策制定者及相关专业学生。

研究方向

主要方向包括精神障碍的临床与流行病学研究、心理治疗与药物干预试验、精神卫生服务与政策、全球精神健康、自杀预防及社会心理因素研究。论文类型涵盖原创研究、系统综述与荟萃分析、临床试验、评论、通讯及观点文章,兼顾方法学创新与临床实践转化。

期刊特色

研究取向强调证据质量与临床相关性,偏好大样本、多中心及具有公共卫生意义的研究,也重视方法学严谨的综述和评论。论文通常要求清晰的临床或政策启示。适合精神医学、临床心理学、公共卫生及卫生政策领域的研究者、临床医生和决策者阅读与投稿。

投稿难度

投稿难度较高,对研究设计、样本量、统计分析和临床意义均有严格要求,常需多中心数据或长期随访支持。建议在投稿前充分打磨研究问题、完善方法学报告并突出对临床实践或卫生政策的增量贡献,同时做好多轮修改和补充分析的心理准备。

Lancet Psychiatry 最新收录文献

  1. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 21.1

    1. Challenges and implications of enabling community-led mental health initiatives.

    1. 赋能社区主导的心理健康倡议的挑战与影响
    作者:
    Tessa Roberts, Karline Braithwaite
    日期:
    2026-09-16

    该文献暂无摘要。

  2. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 21.1
  3. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 21.1

    3. Improving access to antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia in Ethiopia, Nigeria, Rwanda, and South Africa: an evidence-based global consensus.

    3. 改善埃塞俄比亚、尼日利亚、卢旺达和南非精神分裂症患者获得抗精神病药物的机会:基于证据的全球共识
    作者:
    Katharine A Smith, Spyridon Siafis, Robert A McCutcheon, Toby Pillinger, Rachel Upthegrove, James Downs, Soraya Seedat, Emma L Lawrance, Georgia Salanti, Oye Gureje, Ilina Singh, Jennifer Potts, Solomon Teferra, Claudia Sartor, Charles Mudenge, Christoph U Correll, Andrea Cipriani
    日期:
    2026-09-09

    There are disparities in access to antipsychotics for schizophrenia across different country settings. Improving access to a wider and more equitable range of medications in low-income and middle-income countries is a priority. A multidisciplinary team of international experts, including individuals with lived experience, appraised the most relevant and recent information on antipsychotics in schizophrenia and contextualised it to four African countries (Ethiopia, Nigeria, Rwanda, and South Africa) using a validated consensus methodology. We recommended a list of drugs to prioritise to guide clinical implementation and research, and market shaping. We identified key evidence gaps: little of the existing evidence comes from the countries of interest, trials generally involve highly selected populations, and the complexity of real-world settings is not reflected. However, this methodology highlights a route forward to prioritise the best available evidence on pharmacological treatments for schizophrenia at a global scale, which could also be applied to treatments for other mental health conditions.

  4. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 21.1

    4. The efficacy of modified psychodynamic psychotherapy for patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders in Germany: a prospective, single-centre, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.

    4. 改良心理动力学心理治疗对德国精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的疗效:一项前瞻性、单中心、评估者盲法、平行组、随机对照试验
    作者:
    Christiane Montag, Anna-Lena Bröcker, Samuel Bayer, Katrin Becker, Gianna Bertram, Marielle Büttner, Jakob Funcke, Imke Grimm, Sandra-Anna Just, Jasmina Hadzibegovic, Eva Maaßen, Ivan Nenchev, Frauke Stuke, Felix Bermpohl, Andreas Heinz, Günter Lempa, Dorothea von Haebler
    日期:
    2026-09-09

    People with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders have difficulties in interpersonal functioning that remain insufficiently addressed by standard care. Despite long-standing clinical use, psychodynamic psychotherapy has little empirical support compared with other psychosocial treatments for people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. We evaluated the efficacy of Modified Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Schizophrenia (MPP-S), a manualised treatment tailored to the interpersonal vulnerability characteristic of this population, plus treatment as usual (TAU), compared with TAU alone. This prospective, single-centre, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Psychiatric University Hospital of the Charité at St Hedwig Hospital in Berlin, Germany. Participants were outpatients aged 18-64 years who were diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and exclusion criteria included organic brain disorder, somatic illness affecting cerebral function, and current or past alcohol or illicit drug misuse requiring addiction-specific treatment. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 in blocks of ten to MPP-S (minimum 30 sessions) plus TAU or TAU alone. Outcome assessors were masked, but participants and therapists were not. The primary outcome was psychosocial functioning, measured using the Mini International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rating for Limitations of Activities and Participation in Psychological Disorders (Mini-ICF-APP) and evaluated at baseline and prespecified post-treatment (24 months) and follow-up (36 months) assessments. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Linear mixed models were used to analyse incomplete longitudinal data under a missing-at-random assumption. People with lived experience were not formally involved in the design, conduct, or reporting of this study. This trial was preregistered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02576613) and is complete. From Oct 12, 2015, to Dec 7, 2021, 130 participants (57 [44%] female and 73 [56%] male) were randomly assigned to either MPP-S plus TAU (n=65) or TAU alone (n=64). One participant withdrew consent to data analysis. Regarding the primary outcome of psychosocial functioning, linear mixed models showed significant group-by-time interactions favouring the intervention: estimated marginal means indicated adjusted between-group differences in Mini-ICF-APP scores of -3·45 (95% CI -5·51 to -1·40; p=0·0011) at 24 months and -4·07 (-6·19 to -1·94; p=0·0002) at 36 months. The frequency of adverse events was similar between groups. There were three serious adverse events: two participants died by suicide (one in the MPP-S plus TAU group who did not start psychotherapy and one in the TAU alone group) and one participant in the MPP-S plus TAU group was admitted to a forensic hospital. MPP-S added to TAU could improve psychosocial functioning compared with TAU alone. Our findings suggest efficacy and possible long-term benefits of psychodynamic psychotherapy for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and indicate its potential role alongside other psychotherapeutic and psychosocial treatments. Berlin Institute of Health, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychoanalyse, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Tiefenpsychologie, International Psychoanalytic University Berlin, and Köhler-Stiftung.

  5. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 21.1

    5. Comparative effectiveness of mood stabiliser monotherapy versus second-generation antipsychotic monotherapy versus combination therapy for continuation and maintenance treatment after a first episode of psychotic mania in North America, Chile, and Spain: a target trial emulation using data from the BD-CAUSAL Collaboration.

    5. 比较心境稳定剂单药治疗、第二代抗精神病药单药治疗与联合治疗在北美、智利和西班牙首次精神病性躁狂发作后继续和维持治疗中的效果:一项使用BD-CAUSAL协作组数据的目标试验模拟
    作者:
    Alejandro G Szmulewicz, Yu-Hsin Liang, Gonzalo Martínez-Alés, Ryan O'Dea, Lorna E Thorpe, Sarah Conderino, José M Rubio, Kerry Smith, Deepak K Sarpal, Covadonga M Díaz-Caneja, Celso Arango, Paul A Vöhringer, Sophia A Aldunate, Ridha Joober, Jai L Shah, Ashok Malla, Diane Fredrikson, Lakshmi N Yatham, Miguel A Hernán, Dost Öngür
    日期:
    2026-09-09

    The early stage of bipolar I disorder is considered a crucial period for improving long-term outcomes, yet evidence guiding treatment selection after a first manic episode is scarce. Using data from the BD-CAUSAL Collaboration, we aimed to emulate a pragmatic target trial among individuals aged 16 years or older presenting with a first manic episode with psychotic features. For the target trial, individuals were eligible if they were aged 16 years or older, treated at a first-episode psychosis clinic with a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder between Jan 1, 2006, and Dec 31, 2021, with a manic episode (with or without mixed features) with psychotic symptoms based on DSM-5 criteria; not currently hospitalised; had no previous use of mood stabilisers or second-generation antipsychotics in the past 3 months; and had no history of severe side-effects. Treatment strategies compared were initiating mood stabiliser monotherapy, second-generation antipsychotic monotherapy, or combination therapy. Individuals are followed up for up to 2 years. We emulated the target trial using the BD-CAUSAL Collaboration database that includes participants from North America, Chile, and Spain, and is a subset of a large consortium of observational cohorts. Information on mood stabilisers and antipsychotic prescription was identified via data linkages with outpatient and hospitalisation databases. We assessed eligibility for each person-visit between Jan, 1, 2006, and Dec, 31, 2021, and assigned individuals to the treatment strategy that was compatible with their data. The main outcome was hospitalisation or an emergency department visit due to any psychiatry reason over 2 years. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects were estimated using pooled logistic regression adjusted for baseline and time-varying confounders. People with lived experience were not involved in the study design, analysis, or interpretation of findings. Among 371 eligible individuals with bipolar I disorder (465 eligible treatment initiations), 141 (38%) were female, 230 (62%) were male, 216 (58%) were White, 155 (42%) were not White, and the median age was 22 years (IQR 19-25). Of 371 patients, 155 (42%) were hospitalised due to psychiatric reasons over a median of 19·8 months (IQR 16·1-24·0). The 2-year hospitalisation or emergency department visit risk was 42·3% (95% CI 32·5 to 61·1) for mood stabiliser monotherapy, 49·5% (42·4 to 60·6) for second-generation antipsychotic monotherapy, and 42·2% (33·3 to 52·5) for combination therapy. Compared with second-generation antipsychotic monotherapy, the risk was lower with mood stabiliser monotherapy (risk difference -7·3% [95% CI -15·8 to -1·4]; risk ratio 0·82 [0·63 to 0·97]) and combination therapy (-7·4% [-16·0 to -2·1]; 0·82 [0·63 to 0·91]). Risks were similar between mood stabiliser monotherapy and combination therapy. Mood stabiliser-based strategies, alone or in combination, had a lower relapse risk than second-generation antipsychotic monotherapy in the continuation and maintenance treatment after a first episode of mania with psychotic symptoms. These findings would support prioritising mood stabilisers in early treatment and highlight the need for randomised trials for confirmation. ASISA and National Institute of Mental Health.

  6. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 21.1

    6. Association between CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and venlafaxine treatment failure: a retrospective study on two cohorts from Norway and the UK.

    6. CYP2D6和CYP2C19基因型与文拉法辛治疗失败之间的关联:一项针对来自挪威和英国的两个队列的回顾性研究
    作者:
    Yoomi Park, Hasan Çağın Lenk, Yitian Zhou, Volker M Lauschke, Espen Molden
    日期:
    2026-09-09

    Venlafaxine shows superior efficacy over SSRIs in treating major depression. Metabolism of venlafaxine is mediated by CYP2D6 with a secondary role of CYP2C19. The activity of both enzymes is determined by pharmacogenetic variability, which might affect therapeutic response to venlafaxine. We aimed to investigate associations between CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and venlafaxine treatment failure. This retrospective, observational study included two independent, naturalistic cohorts of individuals treated with venlafaxine from the Center for Psychopharmacology (Oslo, Norway) and the UK Biobank. Participants were excluded if they were comedicated with strong CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 inhibitors (ie, bupropion, fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, or levomepromazine) or CYP inducers (ie, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, or phenytoin) at their last venlafaxine therapeutic drug monitoring measurement. Participants were stratified into genotype-predicted poor metabolisers (PMs), intermediate metabolisers (IMs), normal metabolisers (NMs), and ultra-rapid metabolisers (UMs). The primary outcome was treatment failure defined as switching away from venlafaxine to another antidepressant within 1 year after last exposure. People with lived experience did not contribute to the design and writing of this study. Between Jan 1, 2005, and Dec 15, 2025, 5443 participants genotyped for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 (3315 [60·9%] women, 2128 [39·1%] men; mean age 48·9 years [SD 18·6]) were identified from the Center for Psychopharmacology. 3624 participants (2401 [66·3%] women, 1223 [33·7%] men; mean age 56·5 years [SD 9·8]) with prescription data were identified from the UK Biobank between 2006 and 2010. In the Norwegian cohort, odds of switching were 2·05 times higher in CYP2D6 PMs (95% CI 1·53-2·71, p<0·0001), 1·25 times higher in IMs (1·05-1·50, p=0·014), and 1·78 times higher in UMs (1·06-2·83, p=0·021) compared with NMs. Increased odds of switching in CYP2D6 PMs were also shown in the UK Biobank cohort (odds ratio 1·58 [95% CI 1·14-2·19], p=0·0060). CYP2C19 PM status amplified risk of failure in the Norwegian cohort with 6·11 times higher odds of switching in dual PMs versus NMs (95% CI 1·81-18·77, p=0·0019). CYP2D6 PM status was consistently associated with increased risk of venlafaxine treatment failure in two large, real-life cohorts, suggesting that pre-emptive genotyping could facilitate personalised venlafaxine therapy. European Research Council, Swedish Research Council, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Robert Bosch Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, and the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.

  7. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 21.1

    7. Oye Gureje: shaping robust mental health services across Africa.

    7. 奥耶·古雷杰:在非洲各地打造健全的精神卫生服务
    作者:
    Jules Morgan
    日期:
    2026-09-09

    该文献暂无摘要。

  8. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 21.1

    8. Psychodynamic psychotherapy in schizophrenia: where do we stand?

    8. 精神分裂症的心理动力治疗:我们处于何种境地?
    作者:
    Jan Ivar Røssberg, June Ullevoldsæter Lystad
    日期:
    2026-09-09

    该文献暂无摘要。

  9. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 21.1

    9. CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and venlafaxine: from plasma concentration to clinical decision.

    9. CYP2D6、CYP2C19与文拉法辛:从血浆浓度到临床决策
    作者:
    Maike Scherf-Clavel
    日期:
    2026-09-09

    该文献暂无摘要。

  10. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 21.1

    10. Open Dialogue and the evaluation of holistic mental health services: measuring what matters.

    10. 开放对话与整体心理健康服务的评估:衡量真正重要之事
    作者:
    Tomi Bergström
    日期:
    2026-09-09

    该文献暂无摘要。

在 Lancet Psychiatry 中搜索更多文献

支持中英文检索 · 智能翻译 · 影响因子 · PDF 下载 · AI 文献阅读

指标接近的期刊