International Journal of Heritage Studies国际遗产研究杂志
International Journal of Heritage Studies(英文缩写 INT J HERIT STUD),ISSN 1352-7258,eISSN 1470-3610,中文译名:国际遗产研究杂志 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。
发文量统计区间：2025-09-27 至 2026-09-27，按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。
期刊介绍
历年影响因子趋势
| JCR 数据年份 | 影响因子 | JCR 分区 |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1.692 | Q3 |
| 2022 | 1.800 | Q3 |
| 2023 | 2.000 | Q1 |
| 2024 | 1.700 | Q2 |
| 2025 | 2.100 | Q1 |
International Journal of Heritage Studies 最新收录文献
-
1. Can immersive technologies rebuild heritage and sense of place? Examining virtual Reality's role in fostering community resilience in post-disaster Italy.
PMID:日期:2025-01-01Disasters disrupt not only physical environments but also socio-cultural identities and sense of place. This study explores the role of Virtual Reality (VR) in post-disaster recovery, focusing on the earthquake-affected towns of Amatrice and Accumoli, Italy. Using a techno-ethnographic methodology, we integrated video interviews, 3D digital reconstruction, and co-creation to examine how immersive technologies facilitate emotional reconnection and community resilience. Findings suggest that VR environments can serve as spaces for mourning and re-familiarisation, helping individuals reconnect with lost surroundings. Multi-sensory elements (i.e. lighting, soundscapes, and everyday material details) proved crucial in fostering virtual place attachment. Intergenerational use of VR supported memory transmission, as younger community members relied on elders to interpret pre-disaster environments. However, trauma sensitivity remains essential, underscoring the value of community-centred, iterative design. This study contributes to digital heritage research by showing how VR can go beyond documentation, supporting storytelling and story-sharing, memory work, restauration of sense of place, and resilience-building, while calling for further study of its long-term impacts.
-
2. {"_":"The : Jewish religious communities' interactions with synagogues and ceremonial objects in Amsterdam.","i":["Jewish religious heritage continuum"]}
2. {“_”：“阿姆斯特丹犹太宗教团体与犹太教堂和仪式物品的互动。”，“i”：[“犹太宗教遗产连续体”]}PMID:日期:2024-01-01This article explores how rabbis, directors and members of Amsterdam's Jewish religious communities view the heritagisation of Jewish religious life by analysing how they interact with Amsterdam's main synagogues and their collections of ceremonial objects. It focuses on the synagogues of the Jewish Cultural Quarter - the Portuguese Synagogue with its accompanying Sephardi community, and the former Ashkenazi synagogue complex, now the Jewish Museum. From a dynamic heritage perspective, this heterogeneous constellation raises questions about how and why heritage making occurs here. Following a Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology, concurrent data collection and analysis let emerge interrelated conceptual categories that explain how communities interact with these functioning and musealised synagogues and objects: ; ; ; and . These categories intersect in the core category of the , which this article presents as a dynamic embodiment of remembering, reconnection, and revival of Jewish tradition. For the interviewees, these performances, and the deployment of functioning and musealised synagogues and collections, form a cultural apparatus that marks their present, diverse and living material culture and grafts a Jewish future onto a Jewish past.
-
3. Heritagising the South China Sea: appropriation and dispossession of maritime heritage through museums and exhibitions in Southern China.
PMID:日期:2024-01-01With the emergence of critical heritage studies, scholars show that 'bottom up' initiatives that blur the boundaries between private, civil, and state have arisen not as a modernising vision to legitimise national authority but as 'rooted in identification with local community', linking past and future. In China, such studies demonstrate the emergence of a different kind of museology - with 'private' heritage initiatives on behalf of individuals and groups - tolerated by the state authorities through investments that link heritage tourism to development. However, when a maritime vision of national history is at stake, the central state would co-opt 'private' heritage initiatives to subsume them under the wider, sanitised narrative of Chinese maritime civilisation that requires a different relation to the past and its extraction from the localities that do not inscribe their heritage into these universalised visions. Zooming in on three museums in Hainan related to the South China Sea (SCS), I reveal the contradictory claims made by different actors regarding the use, representation and ownership claims of historical seafaring in terms of cultural heritage. Therefore, I argue that heritagisation of seafaring in the SCS represent proprietary and thus territorial claims for China's rhetoric of maritime ecological civilisation.