HOUSING POLICY DEBATE住房政策辩论
HOUSING POLICY DEBATE(英文缩写 HOUS POLICY DEBATE),ISSN 1051-1482,eISSN 2152-050X,中文译名:住房政策辩论 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。
发文量统计区间：2025-10-01 至 2026-09-30，按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。
期刊介绍
历年影响因子趋势
| JCR 数据年份 | 影响因子 | JCR 分区 |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2.420 | Q3 |
| 2022 | 2.900 | Q2 |
| 2023 | 2.800 | Q1 |
| 2024 | 2.900 | Q1 |
| 2025 | 2.200 | Q2 |
HOUSING POLICY DEBATE 最新收录文献
-
1. "It's a Process-But It Shouldn't Take This Long": The Psychological Burden of Waiting for Rental Assistance.
PMID:日期:2026-02-16A growing and severe shortage of affordable housing in the U.S. has led to an increase in cost-burdened households and housing insecurity nationwide. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides rental assistance through programs such as Housing Choice Vouchers and public or project-based housing to increase access to affordable housing. However, available funding for these programs limits their supply, creating extensive waitlists for rental assistance. While the physical and mental health consequences of housing insecurity and cost-burdens are well documented, less is known about how the experience of waiting for rental assistance may contribute to these adverse outcomes. This paper examines qualitative data from a longitudinal mixed-methods study about rental assistance and diabetes self-management. Through thematic analysis of 116 semi-structured interviews collected from 30 unique participants, we describe how the uncertainty of one's waitlist status, an obligation to wait, and a sense of powerlessness in the waiting process contribute to poor mental health among rental assistance applicants. Our findings suggest that the experience of waiting and specific features of the waiting process may exacerbate stressors associated with housing insecurity to the detriment of applicants' psychological wellbeing.
-
2. Factors Associated With Exits From and Returns to Homelessness Among Older Homeless Adults: Results From the HOPE HOME Study.
PMID:日期:2025-11-20Homelessness is dynamic; some individuals cycle between homelessness and housing. In a longitudinal study of 411 adults aged 50 and older who were homeless at study enrollment, we examined the prevalence of and factors associated with exits from and returns to homelessness. With a median 4 years of follow-up, 80% of participants exited homelessness into housing. Having a permanent rental subsidy was associated with retaining housing. Rental subsidies are an effective means to prevent recurring homelessness among older adults who have recently regained housing after a period of homelessness.
-
3. A Descriptive Analysis of Tenant Right to Counsel Law and Praxis 2017-2024.
PMID:日期:2025-04-25This article provides the first comprehensive description of state and local tenant right to counsel (RTC) policies. From July 2017 through June 2024, five states, 17 cities, and one county passed legislation to formally create a right to legal counsel for tenants in eviction proceedings. These policies contain heterogeneous provisions, including their intended purposes, design and administration requirements, eligibility criteria, and when in the eviction process the right is triggered. This study describes laws as adopted in legislation through policy surveillance and legal mapping methods and examines how policies are executed on the ground through qualitative methods that capture the perspective of multiple stakeholders. The pairing of policy surveillance and legal mapping techniques with qualitative interviews demonstrates where real-world implementation both meets and diverges from legislative requirements and identifies barriers that prevent full implementation of the right to counsel, as well as its systemic benefits. In light of the dearth of national information on implementation of RTC programs, the descriptive, qualitative, and analytic framework detailed herein provides researchers, policymakers, and practitioners with instructive insights for evaluating, refining, and advancing RTC policies.
-
4. "Especially being homeless, they just think you're infected with COVID or something": A qualitative exploration of the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on people experiencing homelessness with a history of injection drug use in Baltimore, Maryland.
PMID:日期:2024-07-30People experiencing homelessness with a substance use disorder are a highly structurally vulnerable population, facing a unique burden of compounding stigma, discrimination, and adverse health outcomes. Evidence remains mixed on best practices for housing interventions designed to best meet the needs of this population. Ten people with a history of injection drug use experiencing homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic were interviewed between July, 2021 and February, 2022 in Baltimore, Maryland. Thematic analysis was used to characterize the pandemic's impact on resource access, housing, and substance use among these participants. Participants highlighted substantial challenges resulting from structural changes during the pandemic, including limits on income-generating opportunities and resource access, and increases in experiences of stigma and discrimination. However, several individuals reported decreased substance use in response to changes to their housing status, with those placed in secure housing attributing their decreased use to this change. These accounts can help guide housing and social support interventions best suited to meet the unique needs of people experiencing homelessness with substance use disorders.
-
5. Moving from crisis to stability? The success and limits of an eviction prevention program.
PMID:日期:2024-07-10该文献暂无摘要。
-
6. Meaningful Action: Evaluating Local Government Plans to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing in California.
PMID:日期:2024-04-26A 2018 California law requires local governments to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH) in their General Plan's housing element. This paper examines how eight municipalities reacted to this requirement in three areas of their 2021 plans: the analysis of fair housing issues, proposed fair housing programs, and the location of sites identified for low-income housing development. We consider whether these cities' over 200 fair housing programs are meaningful actions by evaluating their potential impact, and measure the distribution of proposed sites for new low-income housing across neighborhoods. The cities created many new programs in response to the mandate; however, most programs do not meaningfully advance fair housing goals. Moreover, most cities do not modify land-use plans to allow affordable housing in affluent neighborhoods. Additionally, we find a mismatch in the plans. The affluent, majority-white cities that developed more meaningful fair housing programs continued to concentrate sites for affordable housing in their least affluent neighborhoods. Our analysis of potential program impact allows us to identify AFFH oversight challenges and make recommendations for AFFH guidelines. We focus on California, but the research is relevant to federal AFFH implementation and raises questions about how to best advance fair housing goals.
-
7. Do Publicly Funded Neighborhood Investments Impact Individual-Level Health-Related Outcomes? A Longitudinal Study of Two Neighborhoods in Pittsburgh, PA from 2011 to 2018.
PMID:日期:2024-02-19Research examining the relationship between a neighborhood's built-environment and resident health or health-related outcomes has largely either focused on static characteristics using a cross-sectional research design or focuses on the neighborhood in its entirety. Such an approach makes it difficult to understand how specific dynamic neighborhood characteristics are associated with individual well-being. In this analysis, we use longitudinal data from the Pittsburgh Research on Neighborhood Change and Health (PHRESH) studies to assess the relationship between publicly funded neighborhood investments occurring across seven years (2011-2018) on five health-related outcomes: food insecurity, stress, perceived neighborhood safety, neighborhood satisfaction, and dietary quality. We additionally utilize this dataset to determine whether the distance between an individual's place of residence and the investment, as measured at the neighborhood, 1 mile, and ½ mile level, effects the magnitude of associations. Using individual and year fixed effects models, we find that when measured at the neighborhood level, a one standard deviation increase in investments (about $130 million dollars) is associated with decreased food insecurity (-0.294 sd), increased safety (0.231 sd), and increased neighborhood satisfaction (0.201 sd) among adults who remain in the study for at least two waves of data collection. We also analyze specific investment types and find that commercial investments are largely driving the changes in food insecurity, safety, and neighborhood satisfaction, while business investments are correlated with the decrease in stress. We find no relationship between investments and dietary quality.
-
8. Does poor health influence residential selection? Understanding mobility among low-income housing voucher recipients in the Moving to Opportunity Study.
PMID:日期:2024-02-01Housing mobility programs and housing choice vouchers provide low-income families with a potentially-transformative opportunity to move to low-poverty neighborhoods. However, families often face barriers to attaining upward residential mobility; poor health may be one important barrier, although few studies have examined this hypothesis. We used the experimental Moving to Opportunity (MTO) Study, constructed residential trajectories, and linked neighborhood opportunity measures to over 14,000 addresses of 3526 families across 7 years. We used latent growth curve longitudinal models to test how baseline health modified effects of MTO housing voucher treatment on neighborhood opportunity trajectories. Results show that poor baseline health adversely influenced how the voucher induced upward mobility. Voucher receipt strongly promoted residential mobility if families were healthy; moreover the low-poverty neighborhood voucher plus counseling treatment promoted higher opportunity neighborhood attainment compared to controls, regardless of the baseline health of the family. However families with health vulnerabilities did not retain the same initial neighborhood gains conferred by the housing choice voucher treatment, as families without health vulnerabilities. These results suggest that housing counseling may be one necessary element to expand neighborhood choice into higher opportunity neighborhoods for families with health challenges. Providing housing vouchers alone are insufficient to promote low-income family high opportunity moves, for families who have disabilities or special needs. The implications of these results point to scaling up housing mobility programs, to provide tailored support for low-income families to use housing choice vouchers to make high opportunity moves, which is particularly necessary for families with health challenges.
-
9. The Race to Exclude: Residential Growth Controls in California Cities, 1970-1992.
PMID:日期:2023-12-19Local regulations that restrict residential growth are a key driver of California's affordable housing crisis. Scholars have argued these growth controls were implemented in the late 20th century by cities intending to exclude Black households. However, growth controls may also have plausibly been driven by a desire to exclude growing Hispanic, Asian, and foreign-born populations; by increased concern about the negative environmental consequences of population growth; or by homeowners' or cities' fiscal motivations. I jointly test these competing explanations using time-varying data on the adoption of a variety of residential growth controls covering California cities from 1970-1992. I find that, all else equal, cities with a lower share of Black residents-both in absolute terms, and relative to their metropolitan area-were more likely to pass residential growth controls. I also find some evidence that growth controls were more likely to be passed in areas experiencing greater Black population growth and in cities more supportive of White-Black segregation. Finally, I find strong evidence that, net of other factors, cities in areas more supportive of policies to protect the environment were more likely to pass residential growth controls.
-
10. Disaster Preparedness and Housing Tenure: How Do Subsidized Renters Fare?
PMID:日期:2023-07-04Homeowners are significantly more prepared for disasters than renters. However, disaster preparedness among subsidized renters is an understudied topic despite their increased vulnerability to negative disaster outcomes. Previous research shows that one in three subsidized units is at risk for exposure to disasters, relative to one in four unsubsidized rental units, and one in seven owner-occupied units. Subsidized housing residents often fall into many vulnerable statuses that would make them less prepared than renters and owners. Using 2017 American Housing Survey data, we examine differences in household disaster preparedness by housing tenure, with and without controls for such factors. Logistic regression analyses indicate that subsidized renters are significantly less prepared than unsubsidized renters, and both renter types are significantly less prepared than homeowners, controlling for demographic and neighborhood characteristics. The policy implications of this research are considered as they relate to the location and management of subsidized housing in an era of climate change.