JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY人类学考古学杂志

JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY(英文缩写 J ANTHROPOL ARCHAEOL),ISSN 0278-4165,eISSN 1090-2686,中文译名:人类学考古学杂志 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。

2026 年数据 · 影响因子
2.000
JCR 分区
Q1
CAS 分区
B1
近一年发文量
0
本站 PubMed 收录统计

发文量统计区间:2025-09-28 至 2026-09-28,按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。

ISSN: 0278-4165 · eISSN: 1090-2686 · 缩写: J ANTHROPOL ARCHAEOL ·中文: 人类学考古学杂志

期刊介绍

选择期刊介绍栏目

期刊简介

《Journal of Anthropological Archaeology》是一本国际同行评议期刊,聚焦考古学与人类学交叉领域,致力于从理论和方法层面解释人类社会的长期变迁。主要领域涵盖史前考古、社会复杂化、生计策略、仪式与象征、技术演化及景观考古等。读者群包括考古学家、人类学家、历史学者及对文化演化感兴趣的研究者。

研究方向

期刊欢迎基于考古材料探讨人类行为、社会组织和文化变迁的原创研究。主题包括聚落形态、生计经济、交换网络、权力与不平等、仪式实践、认知考古及人地关系。论文类型以实证研究为主,兼收理论探讨、方法创新和区域性综合述评。

期刊特色

研究取向强调理论驱动与实证结合,注重跨文化比较和长时段视角。论文通常要求扎实的考古证据和明确的人类学问题意识。适合从事考古学、人类学及相关交叉学科的研究者,尤其是关注社会演化、文化生态和物质文化理论的学者。

投稿难度

投稿难度中等偏上,期刊对理论贡献和证据充分性要求较高。建议在投稿前明确研究的人类学问题,强化论证逻辑,并充分回应考古材料的不确定性。适合有较好英文写作基础、能清晰阐述理论意义的作者。

历年影响因子趋势

JCR 数据年份影响因子JCR 分区
20212.312Q1
20221.800Q2
20232.000Q1
20242.200Q1
20252.000Q1

JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 最新收录文献

  1. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 2

    1. Editorial: Journal Editor Transition and COVID-19 pandemic submissions.

    作者:
    George R Milner, Meghan Howey, M Anne Katzenberg
    日期:
    2021-03-01

    该文献暂无摘要。

  2. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 2

    2. Editorial.

    作者:
    George R Milner, M Anne Katzenberg
    日期:
    2020-09-01

    该文献暂无摘要。

  3. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 2

    3. Using obsidian transfer distances to explore social network maintenance in late Pleistocene hunter-gatherers.

    作者:
    Eiluned Pearce, Theodora Moutsiou
    日期:
    2014-12-01

    Social behaviour is notoriously difficult to study archaeologically and it is unclear how large the networks of prehistoric humans were, or how they remained connected. Maintaining social cohesion was crucial for early humans because social networks facilitate cooperation and are imperative for survival and reproduction. Recent hunter-gatherer social organisation typically comprises a number of nested layers, ranging from the nuclear family through to the ~1500-strong ethnolinguistic tribe. Here we compare maximum obsidian transfer distances from the late Pleistocene with ethnographic data on the size of the geographic areas associated with each of these social grouping layers in recent hunter-gatherers. The closest match between the two is taken to indicate the maximum social layer within which contact could be sustained by Pleistocene hominins. Within both the (sub)tropical African and Subarctic biomes, the maximum obsidian transfer distances for Pleistocene modern humans (~200km and ~400km respectively) correspond to the geographic ranges of the outermost tribal layer in recent hunter-gatherers. This suggests that modern humans could potentially sustain the cohesion of their entire tribe at all latitudes, even though networks are more dispersed nearer the poles. Neanderthal obsidian transfer distances (300km) indicate that although Neanderthal home ranges are larger than those of low latitude hominins, Neanderthals travelled shorter distances than modern humans living at the same high latitudes. We argue that, like modern humans, Neanderthals could have maintained tribal cohesion, but that their tribes were substantially smaller than those of contemporary modern humans living in similar environments. The greater time taken to traverse the larger modern human tribal ranges may have limited the frequency of their face-to-face interactions and thus necessitated additional mechanisms to ensure network connectivity, such as the exchange of symbolic artefacts including ornaments and figurines. Such cultural supports may not have been required to the same extent by the Neanderthals due to their smaller tribes and home ranges.

  4. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B1 影响因子: 2

    4. Food and social complexity at Çayönü Tepesi, southeastern Anatolia: Stable isotope evidence of differentiation in diet according to burial practice and sex in the early Neolithic.

    作者:
    Jessica Pearson, Matt Grove, Metin Ozbek, Hitomi Hongo
    日期:
    2013-06-01

    The identification of early social complexity and differentiation in early village societies has been approached in the past most notably through the evaluation of rituals and architectural layouts. Such studies could be complemented by an approach that provides data about everyday behaviours of individuals. We took 540 human and animal bone samples for stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis from the Neolithic site of Çayönü Tepesi in southeastern Anatolia. The inhabitants at this site chose to bury their dead in two different ways at different times during its occupation: beneath the floors of their houses, but also inside a public mortuary building known as the Skull Building. This variation provides an opportunity using isotope methods to test whether there was evidence for structuring of daily activities (diet in this case) that might serve to reinforce this change in burial practice. We show that when the inhabitants of Çayönü Tepesi changed their architecture and operated different burial practices in conjunction, this coincided with other aspects of behaviour including socially-constituted food consumption practices, which served to reinforce social identities.

在 JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 中搜索更多文献

支持中英文检索 · 智能翻译 · 影响因子 · PDF 下载 · AI 文献阅读

指标接近的期刊