MIS QUARTERLY管理信息系统季刊

MIS QUARTERLY(英文缩写 MIS QUART),ISSN 0276-7783,中文译名:管理信息系统季刊 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。

2026 年数据 · 影响因子
7.300
JCR 分区
Q1
CAS 分区
B2
近一年发文量
1
本站 PubMed 收录统计

发文量统计区间:2025-11-01 至 2026-10-31,按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。

ISSN: 0276-7783 · eISSN: - · 缩写: MIS QUART ·中文: 管理信息系统季刊

期刊介绍

选择期刊介绍栏目

期刊简介

MIS Quarterly 是信息系统领域历史最悠久、影响力最广的旗舰学术期刊之一,由国际信息系统协会(AIS)相关学术共同体支持。期刊聚焦信息技术在组织、市场与社会中的应用与管理,涵盖系统开发、数据分析、人机交互、数字创新与治理等议题。读者主要为高校研究者、博士生及企业信息化管理者,强调理论贡献与严谨实证,是信息系统学科方向的重要发表平台。

研究方向

主要研究方向包括信息系统管理与战略、IT与组织变革、电子商务与数字平台、人机交互与用户行为、数据科学与商业分析、信息安全与隐私、数字创新与创业等。论文类型以理论驱动或实证研究为主,兼收设计科学、案例研究、方法论与综述性文章,鼓励跨学科视角和混合研究方法。

期刊特色

期刊强调理论深度与方法严谨,偏好能推动信息系统学科知识边界的研究,而非单纯应用描述。论文通常要求清晰的理论框架、扎实的数据或设计论证以及对管理实践的启示。适合信息系统、管理科学、组织行为与计算机应用交叉领域的研究者、教师和博士生阅读与投稿。

投稿难度

投稿难度较高,属于信息系统领域竞争最激烈的期刊之一。评审重视理论贡献、方法透明度和研究问题的原创性,修改轮次可能较多。建议作者在投稿前充分打磨理论框架,完善研究设计与数据论证,并参考近期同类论文的写作规范,不宜仅凭分区或指标判断录用可能性。

历年影响因子趋势

JCR 数据年份影响因子JCR 分区
20218.513Q1
20227.300Q1
20237.000Q1
20246.000Q1
20257.300Q1

MIS QUARTERLY 最新收录文献

  1. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B2 影响因子: 7.3

    1. VALIDITY IN DESIGN SCIENCE.

    1. 设计科学中的有效性
    作者:
    Kai R Larsen, Roman Lukyanenko, Roland M Mueller, Veda C Storey, Jeffrey Parsons, Debra VanderMeer, Dirk S Hovorka
    日期:
    2025-12

    Researchers must ensure that the claims about the knowledge produced by their work are valid. However, validity is neither well-understood nor consistently established in design science, which involves the development and evaluation of artifacts (models, methods, instantiations, and theories) to solve problems. As a result, it is challenging to demonstrate and communicate the validity of knowledge claims about artifacts. This paper defines validity in design science and derives the Design Science Validity Framework and a process model for applying it. The framework comprises three high-level claim and validity types-criterion, causal, and context-as well as validity subtypes. The framework guides researchers in integrating validity considerations into projects employing design science and contributes to the growing body of research on design science methodology. It also provides a systematic way to articulate and validate the knowledge claims of design science projects. We apply the framework to examples from existing research and then use it to demonstrate the validity of knowledge claims about the framework itself.

  2. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B2 影响因子: 7.3

    2. AI-Augmented Content Validation in Behavioral Research: Development and Evaluation of the RATER System.

    作者:
    Jean-Charles Pillet, Kai R Larsen, David Dobolyi, Magno Queiroz, Abram Handler, Jan Ketil Arnulf, Rajeev Sharma
    日期:
    2025-06-23

    Content validation is an essential aspect of the scale development process that ensures that measurement instruments capture their intended constructs. However, researchers rarely undertake this core step in behavioral research because it requires costly data collection and specialized expertise. We present RATER (Replicable Approach to Expert Ratings), a free web-based system (www.contval.org) that can help the broader research community (scientists, reviewers, students) gain quick and reliable insights into the content validity of measurement instruments. Guided by psychometric measurement theory, RATER evaluates whether a scale's items correspond to their intended construct, remain distinct from other constructs, and adequately represent all aspects of the construct's content domain. The system employs two unique artificial intelligence models, RATER and RATER, which leverage psychometric scales from 2,443 journal articles spanning eight disciplines and two state-of-the-art large language model architectures (i.e., BERT and GPT). A set of six complementary studies confirms the RATER system's accuracy, reliability, and usefulness. We find RATER can augment the scale development and validation process, increasing the validity of findings in behavioral research.

  3. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B2 影响因子: 7.3

    3. Digression and Value Concatenation to Enable Privacy-Preserving Regression.

    作者:
    Xiao-Bai Li, Sumit Sarkar
    日期:
    2014-09

    Regression techniques can be used not only for legitimate data analysis, but also to infer private information about individuals. In this paper, we demonstrate that regression trees, a popular data-analysis and data-mining technique, can be used to effectively reveal individuals' sensitive data. This problem, which we call a "regression attack," has not been addressed in the data privacy literature, and existing privacy-preserving techniques are not appropriate in coping with this problem. We propose a new approach to counter regression attacks. To protect against privacy disclosure, our approach introduces a novel measure, called , which assesses the sensitive value disclosure risk in the process of building a regression tree model. Specifically, we develop an algorithm that uses the measure for pruning the tree to limit disclosure of sensitive data. We also propose a dynamic value-concatenation method for anonymizing data, which better preserves data utility than a user-defined generalization scheme commonly used in existing approaches. Our approach can be used for anonymizing both numeric and categorical data. An experimental study is conducted using real-world financial, economic and healthcare data. The results of the experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach is very effective in protecting data privacy while preserving data quality for research and analysis.

在 MIS QUARTERLY 中搜索更多文献

支持中英文检索 · 智能翻译 · 影响因子 · PDF 下载 · AI 文献阅读

指标接近的期刊