AMBIO
AMBIO(英文缩写 AMBIO),ISSN 0044-7447,eISSN 1654-7209 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。
发文量统计区间：2025-11-01 至 2026-10-31，按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。
期刊介绍
历年影响因子趋势
| JCR 数据年份 | 影响因子 | JCR 分区 |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6.943 | Q1 |
| 2022 | 6.500 | Q1 |
| 2023 | 5.800 | Q1 |
| 2024 | 5.100 | Q1 |
| 2025 | 5.700 | Q1 |
AMBIO 最新收录文献
-
1. Claws, consequences and coexistence: Local community attitudes toward large carnivores in mountain landscapes.
PMID:日期:2026-10-04Human attitudes toward large carnivores are shaped by multiple interrelated socio-psychological factors, yet conservation interventions often focus on reducing material impacts while paying less attention to underlying attitude drivers. We investigated attitudes towards three large carnivore species: Persian leopard (Panthera pardus), grey wolf (Canis lupus), and brown bear (Ursus arctos) among communities around Golestan National Park, Iran. Using interview data from 292 participants across 30 villages, we applied Bayesian structural equation modelling to examine how cognitive beliefs, social beliefs, perceived management responsibility, and livestock loss relate to attitudes towards each species. Cognitive beliefs emerged as the strongest predictor across all three species, whereas social beliefs, management responsibility, and livestock loss varied in influence. The limited role of livestock loss suggests that reducing carnivore impacts alone is insufficient to promote coexistence. Instead, conservation efforts should combine practical conflict-mitigation measures with strategies engaging local beliefs, social norms, and expectations of wildlife management.
-
2. Designing with, not over, the bay: Towards a relational public design in post-Yolanda Tacloban.
PMID:日期:2026-10-04This paper examines how water, people, and governance are designed to coexist in Tacloban City's post-Yolanda recovery, focusing on the contested Cancabato Causeway. Using public sector design and policy assemblage theory, we ask how actors assemble infrastructures, documents, and practices to materialize futures for Cancabato Bay. Combining in-depth interviews, document analysis, and participant observation, we identified three policy assemblages. A technocratic assemblage organizes the bay as a corridor for mobility and investment, proceduralizing participation and equating resilience with new infrastructure. An environmental advocacy assemblage challenges this vision through law, evidence, and environmental justice, yet remains partly constrained by anthropocentric ways of knowing. A fisherfolk-bay assemblage foregrounds everyday practices of living-with-water and hopes for futures shared with the bay. We draw three lessons for public design: it is inherently relational, it must work with multiplicity, and it must treat participation as future-making rather than an end in itself.
-
3. Evolving motivations for participation in community-based conservation: A relational perspective.
PMID:日期:2026-10-01Successful outcomes of community-based conservation, both ecological and social, rely on local actors being motivated to engage at the outset of the programme and to sustain their motivation over time. Using semi-structured interviews, we explore the motivations of 22 community Conservation Officers who have participated in marine turtle conservation in Tanzania for more than two decades. We focus on factors that motivated initial participation, as well as those that contributed to sustaining their participation over the past 20 years. Our study reveals the intricate dynamics of motivational processes, including the influence of values, identities, autonomy, agency, and power, which are shaped by relationships between nature, people, and place. With these findings, we challenge dominant assumptions about economic motivations and highlight the risk of over-reliance on monetary incentives to drive participation in community-based conservation.
-
4. Reading persistence: Social inertia as a cross-disciplinary framework for sustainability transformation.
PMID:日期:2026-09-22Sustainability research routinely treats inertia as the obstacle that explains why interventions fail to embed in everyday life. This Perspective argues that what is labelled as inertia is often patterned persistence-signal rather than noise-carrying moral commitments, ecological knowledge and potentially protective strategies. I define social inertia (SI) as the patterned continuation of social trajectories shaped by historical pathways, embodied routines, institutional arrangements and cultural attachments, and propose a five-part typology (institutional, embodied, narrative, ritual and infrapolitical) giving the concept analytical depth beyond the mechanistic vocabularies of lock-in, regime stability and behavioural habit. A methodological orientation drawn from the humanities and interpretive social sciences-archival reading against the grain, oral history, and Future Design-reads SI across past, present and imagined-future registers. The reconceptualisation reframes the field's diagnostic starting point: not "why does change fail" but what the patterning of continuity reveals about the lives interventions seek to alter.
-
5. Highlighting the structural complexity of Europe's leading seafood processing hub: Building a social-ecological network with actor-network theory.
PMID:日期:2026-09-21The seafood sector faces multiple challenges that threaten its contribution to food security. For developing effective governance strategies in response to those transformations, this study proposes a theoretical framework grounded in Actor-Network Theory (ANT), applied to the construction of a Social-Ecological Network (SEN), to better understand the structural complexity of the seafood sector SES in Boulogne-sur-Mer, Europe's leading seafood processing hub. Through semi-structured interviews, direct observations, and participatory workshops, we identified 227 nodes and 595 links across environmental, economic, productive, and social categories framing the seafood sector. The descriptive analysis of the network reveals that operational production entities constitute the network's core, shaping how environmental resources, economic support, and social regulations are organized. By making visible the diversity of components, their multi-layer interactions, and interdependencies within this system, our approach provides decision-makers with evidence-based insights for developing strategies that align with the seafood sector's systemic reality and sustainability challenges.
-
6. The biodiversity we ignore: A global meta-analysis on taxonomic bias.
PMID:日期:2026-09-21As biodiversity decline continues, there is a critical need to document, monitor, and protect species equitably across the tree of life. However, both scientific research and societal perceptions of biodiversity are often biased toward large, colorful, charismatic, familiar, or otherwise "useful" species. We conducted a global meta-analysis encompassing 905 effect sizes from 78 studies across three decades of research assessing drivers of taxonomic bias. Positive biases were widespread across study designs, regions, and taxonomic scopes, with plants and invertebrates typically receiving disproportionately less attention than vertebrates. However, the magnitude of bias was generally small (Pearson's r < 0.5), suggesting mild impacts on research agendas. Concerningly, conservation priority emerged as the only dimension not consistently associated with positive bias, suggesting a misalignment between research attention, funding, public interest, and conservation needs. We conclude that while biases are pervasive across taxonomic groups, they are subtle-but their conservation consequences warrant urgent correction.
-
7. Socioeconomic potential of seaweed aquaculture in the Mekong River Delta, Vietnam: An integrative review.
PMID:日期:2026-09-21Seaweed aquaculture is increasingly promoted within blue economy strategies, but evidence for the Mekong River Delta (MRD), Vietnam, remains fragmented. This PRISMA-informed narrative integrative review screened 460 records after duplicate removal and retained 85 evidence sources. The synthesis compared species suitability, farming systems, value chains, economic evidence, and governance constraints. Gracilaria tenuistipitata had the strongest support for brackish shrimp-pond integration; MRD studies reported standing biomass of 2.13-11.78 t fresh weight ha and associations with higher shrimp yield and profit. Kappaphycus, Eucheuma, Ulva, and Caulerpa required site- or market-specific validation. Shrimp-seaweed IMTA was better aligned with variable salinity than near-shore carrageenophyte systems, whereas IMTA-RAS remained pilot-scale and capital-intensive. Reported NPV and IRR values were too heterogeneous for valid pooling, and no standardized MRD-specific estimates were available. Thus, evidence supports selected pathways, particularly Gracilaria integration, but not a mature or quantitatively documented MRD-wide sector.
-
8. The Beaver Futures Framework: Stakeholder value perspectives on future human-beaver coexistence.
PMID:日期:2026-09-21Human-wildlife coexistence increasingly requires approaches that make diverse value perspectives explicit. We introduce the Beaver Futures Framework (BFF), which integrates intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values, as well as instrumental damages of beavers, to support more inclusive discussions on beaver management in the Netherlands. We applied the BFF in a workshop with beaver professionals to examine how participants valued beavers and how these values related to their self-placement within the framework. The BFF proved effective for systematically exploring and collecting beaver values, stimulating mutual understanding among participants, and revealing both shared and divergent perspectives within the group. These findings demonstrate the framework's potential to support inclusive stakeholder engagement and to map value plurality in ways that inform coexistence strategies. Because of its generic structure, the BFF can be adapted to other species or ecosystems, offering a promising tool for navigating complex human-wildlife interactions in increasingly anthropogenic landscapes.
-
9. What health are we talking about? Biodiversity as the missing link between One Health and Planetary Health.
PMID:日期:2026-09-15Health has become a central term in global sustainability policy, yet it is often used without sufficient conceptual precision. Public health, global health, One Health, EcoHealth, GeoHealth, and Planetary Health each emphasize different dimensions of the relationship between humans, animals, and the environment. In policy contexts, however, these distinctions are frequently blurred. We argue that biodiversity is often treated as an environmental co-benefit rather than as a foundational determinant of health. This weakens the implementation of One Health approaches because biodiversity underpins disease regulation, immune system development, food and water security, ecosystem functioning, resilience, and climate adaptation. At the same time, biodiversity provides a critical link between One Health and broader Planetary Health challenges, including global environmental change and the transgression of planetary boundaries. Future health and sustainability policies should move beyond generic references to health and explicitly recognize biodiversity as part of preventive health systems.
-
10. Nitrous oxide under the international ozone regime: A new governance pathway for a growing threat.
PMID:日期:2026-09-05A 1.5 °C world and healthy stratospheric ozone layer is impossible to achieve without ambitious action to reduce nitrous oxide (NO) emissions. While NO is currently controlled under the international climate regime, only a handful of countries have committed to reduction targets. We argue that the international community should consider controlling NO under the Montreal Protocol, the international ozone agreement. The Montreal Protocol is widely considered the most successful international environmental agreement ever. The Protocol's focus on production and consumption is well suited to nitrogen pollution, and it has a successful track record in the agricultural sector-NO's dominant source. A special report from the Protocol's assessment panels could provide the scientific foundation for action, and an initial focus on industrial NO could be a springboard to address additional sectors. In short, the international ozone agreement creates a unique opportunity for action on a multifaceted threat that we can no longer ignore.