ENGLISH HISTORICAL REVIEW英国历史评论

ENGLISH HISTORICAL REVIEW(英文缩写 ENGL HIST REV),ISSN 0013-8266,eISSN 1477-4534,中文译名:英国历史评论 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。

2026 年数据 · 影响因子
0.600
JCR 分区
Q1
CAS 分区
B2
近一年发文量
0
本站 PubMed 收录统计

发文量统计区间:2025-09-27 至 2026-09-27,按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。

ISSN: 0013-8266 · eISSN: 1477-4534 · 缩写: ENGL HIST REV ·中文: 英国历史评论

期刊介绍

选择期刊介绍栏目

期刊简介

《English Historical Review》是英语世界历史学领域历史最悠久的综合性学术期刊之一,创刊于十九世纪,长期被视为英国史与欧洲史研究的重要发表平台。刊物涵盖从中世纪到现当代的广泛时段,兼收英国史、欧洲史及全球史议题,注重实证研究与史学解释的深度结合。读者群主要为高校历史学者、研究生及对严肃史学研究有兴趣的专业人士。

研究方向

主要刊载研究论文、史学述评和长篇书评,选题覆盖政治史、社会史、经济史、文化史、宗教史与外交史等方向,时段自中世纪延伸至二十世纪。除专题论文外,也发表具有方法论反思和学术史梳理性质的评论文章,并设有大量书评栏目,评介英语学界重要新著。

期刊特色

研究取向偏重档案实证与史学论证的严密性,强调原创性和对既有研究的推进,篇幅通常较长,注释详尽。论文写作规范、论证节奏稳健,适合已有扎实史料基础、希望在国际史学界展开对话的成熟研究者,也适合作为研究生了解英语史学研究范式的参考读物。

投稿难度

投稿难度较高,刊物对选题的史学意义、史料运用和论证深度均有严格要求,且来稿竞争激烈。建议在投稿前充分打磨论证结构,明确自身研究对既有学术脉络的贡献,并注意符合刊物的注释体例与书评传统。是否录用更多取决于研究本身的原创性与完成度,而非单一分区指标。

历年影响因子趋势

JCR 数据年份影响因子JCR 分区
20210.661Q2
20220.700Q2
20230.500Q1
20240.800Q1
20250.600Q1

ENGLISH HISTORICAL REVIEW 最新收录文献

  1. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B2 影响因子: 0.6
  2. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B2 影响因子: 0.6

    2. Medical Practice, Urban Politics and Patronage: The London 'Commonalty' of Physicians and Surgeons of the 1420s.

    作者:
    Justin Colson, Robert Ralley
    日期:
    2015-10-01

    Medical practice in fifteenth-century England is often seen as suffering from the low status and unregulated practice of which Thomas Linacre later complained. Unlike in many European cities, the provision of physic was uncontrolled, and while urban guilds oversaw surgery as a manual art, no comprehensive system of medical organisation or regulation existed. However, in a remarkable episode of the 1420s, a group of university-trained physicians and elite surgeons associated with Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, briefly established just such a system. While their efforts initially secured approval for a national scheme, it was only in the City of London that they succeeded in implementing their plans. The detailed ordinances of the collegiate 'commonalty' they founded provide a unique insight into their attitudes. Drawing on continental models, they attempted to control all medicine within the city by establishing a hierarchy of practitioners, preventing illicit and incompetent practice, and offering treatment to even the poorest Londoners. Yet they failed to appreciate the vested interests of civic politics: achieving these aims meant curtailing the rights of the powerful Grocers and the Barbers, a fact made clear by their adjudication of a case involving two members of the Barbers' Company, and the Barbers' subsequent riposte-a mayoral petition that heralded the commonalty's end. Its founder surgeons went on to revitalise their Surgeons' Fellowship, which continued independently of the Barbers until a merger in 1540; in contrast, the physicians withdrew from civic affairs, and physic remained entirely unregulated until episcopal licensing was instituted in 1511.

  3. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B2 影响因子: 0.6

    3. Women and children first? The administration of Titanic relief in Southampton, 1912–59.

    作者:
    Sarah Gregson
    日期:
    2012-01-01

    One of the principal narratives woven around the 1912 sinking of the Titanic is that the tragedy united people around the world in a shared sense of horror and grief. This study examines the administration of the relief fund collected for victims and questions the established image of social unity and collective suffering. The records of the Southampton Titanic Relief Fund reveal welfare processes imbued with class and gender prejudices that consigned many of the relatives of victims to poverty-stricken lives, despite the massive fund collected in their names.

  4. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B2 影响因子: 0.6
  5. JCR分区: Q1 CAS分区: B2 影响因子: 0.6

在 ENGLISH HISTORICAL REVIEW 中搜索更多文献

支持中英文检索 · 智能翻译 · 影响因子 · PDF 下载 · AI 文献阅读

指标接近的期刊