AMERICAN SPEECH美国语言
AMERICAN SPEECH(英文缩写 AM SPEECH),ISSN 0003-1283,eISSN 1527-2133,中文译名:美国语言 是一本学术期刊。本页汇总该期刊的最新影响因子、分区信息以及最新收录于 PubMed 的文献,帮助您快速了解期刊全貌。
发文量统计区间：2025-09-27 至 2026-09-27，按本站收录文献的发表日期统计。
期刊介绍
历年影响因子趋势
| JCR 数据年份 | 影响因子 | JCR 分区 |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 0.429 | Q4 |
| 2022 | 0.500 | Q4 |
| 2023 | 1.000 | Q2 |
| 2024 | 0.800 | Q3 |
| 2025 | 0.500 | Q3 |
AMERICAN SPEECH 最新收录文献
-
1. Vowel Duration in Three American English Dialects.
PMID:日期:2007-01-01The article reports on an acoustic investigation into the duration of five American English vowels, those found in hid, head, had, hayed, and hide. We compare duration across three major dialect areas: the Inland North, Midlands, and South. The results show systematic differences across all vowels studied, with the longest durations in the South and the shortest in the Inland North, with the Midlands in an intermediate but distinct position. More generally, the sample differs from and complements other work on this question by including detailed evidence from relatively small, cohesive areas, each within a different established dialect region.
-
4. "Everybody sounds the same": Otherwise Overlooked Ideology in Perceptual Dialectolgy.
PMID:When analyzing dialectology survey data, researchers usually exclude respondents who do not complete the survey as directed. It is argued here that such "unusable" responses can be considered "outlier" data and analyzed rather than be excluded, allowing otherwise overlooked language ideologies to emerge. Responses to a perceptual dialectology map survey in which 31 of the 229 respondents wrote comments on a map of Washington state, without drawing lines around perceived dialect areas as instructed, are described to illustrate this point. In the present data, ideologies such as the homogeneity of dialects and the importance of an urban/rural dichotomy surfaced. These themes are examined in terms outlined by Judith Irvine and Susan Gal in their discussion of how ideological processes are evident in language data. In addition, methodological issues regarding the presuppositions and orientation of respondents to the questionnaire itself are raised.